Then what happens when you present the same question in regards to other play styles? As mentioned you still want to falsely make a negative argument against multiboxing without mentioning other play styles.
The answer was in the form of showing a sample of other play styles. If you want a larger sample it can be provided but it appears you’re not interested in other play styles and how they are affected by the question.
We’re talking about all ways to play the game in making a valid point. If you only focus for example on the fact that multiboxing has an advantage over a single person playing one account then you completely ignore the game design. In other words the game design allows players to group therefore giving them an unfair advantage over one person that doesn’t group. It’s the same with a multiboxer. The multiboxer has an unfair advantage over one person that doesn’t group. But you need to mention other play styles in order to determine if the point is valid.
thats not what im doing. im explaining why multiboxers have an unfair advantage over other players in the aspects of killing mobs, farming gold, completing dungeons, and surviving pvp more than other players because they pay more money than a player who pays $15 a month like normal
Grouping is always an unfair advantage over one person playing one account no matter how you spin it. It’s by design that way. The people that group, join a guild, have more on their side have an unfair advantage to those that don’t. It’s by design that way. Whether or not a multiboxer does it, it’s still an advantage or unfair advantage however term you want to use over one person playing one account that doesn’t group.
This is the most pointless argument of all time. We all know multi-boxing gives an unfair advantage to the individual doing so Prepared is being deliberately dense as he does so himself and its part of his livelihood.
You’re still wanting to compare the group to one person that doesn’t group in terms of how much is paid. That’s an apples to oranges comparison. The single person can’t clear the dungeon. The group can so the group amount is compared to the multiboxer that can also clear the dungeon. Both paid $75.
Yes and most aren’t aware that a group also gives an unfair advantage or just an advantage to the individual. Why is this? Because people that argue against multiboxers don’t want to consider the game design in their argument. It’s by design of all MMORPGs that groups have unfair or simply an advantage over one person that doesn’t group. Whether or not you use the term “unfair” or not, it’s still an advantage. Just because a multiboxer forms a group doesn’t make it any more unfair over a group not multiboxed that is more powerful than a single player.
Only because you don’t do it. That’s why you state it that way. It’s a different play style that you don’t do. We’ve been all through this many times. You don’t want to acknowledge that a group is more powerful than one player and the one player that doesn’t group is still at a disadvantage over the group whether multiboxed or not.
Grouping will always have an advantage or unfair advantage whatever term you want to use, over the player that doesn’t group. It’s like this is in all MMORPGs by design of how they work. Just because a multiboxer forms a group doesn’t make it any more unfair or simply advantaged over the one person any differently. It’s still an advantage whether you want to use the term unfair or not.
Then you agree but you want to claim it’s ‘unfair’ only when a multiboxer has the power over the one player that doesn’t group. It’s still unfair in PvE or PvP against the one player that doesn’t group.
So we are in agreement that a group has more power than a person that doesn’t group and it’s either an unfair advantage or simply an advantage. But the group whether multiboxed or not still has the advantage over one person that doesn’t group.