Are you saying we need more then $15 to enjoy WoW? Cause that’s what i’m getting from your comment. Answer my question directly: yes or no.
So when a multiboxer forms a group that farms a dungeon. Your argument is that the group was formed quicker. That’s what your argument was at first. Then you were in agreement that the group can clear the dungeon just as a multiboxer would. But you don’t want to compare the group that cleared the dungeon to a multiboxer in terms of how much was paid for the accounts to play at that point. Got it
not only that, but its one guy
Incorrect the group pays the same as the multiboxer would. Both $75.
I already answered that question. WTF is wrong with you?
actually im correct because i said player not group
yes one guy paying the same as the group.
Both $75.
one player paying $15 vs one player paying $75
Can you tell me the answer here again please? Or do i have to default to an answer that will be wrong to you regardless what answer i pick?
It’s just a simple question.
If you can’t afford $15 a month you shouldn’t be playing video games.
anyone else want to make the false claim that 5 man groups are equivalent to multiboxers?
Here you go:
ill go ahead and make my points again.
multiboxing is unfair because it allows one player to gain the advantages of a group without actually having to group up with other players
multiboxing is unfair because it allows one player to gain the advantages of a group without actually having to group up with other players
Why is that “unfair”?
Why is that “unfair
because the only way to do the same is to pay money
So no, you never said that?.. alright then. So no, we don’t need to spend more then $15 to enjoy wow.
I know why you players cant get the black lotus, it’s because you are arguing on forums instead of playing.
it’s because you are arguing on forums instead of playing.
Kinda makes me wonder why your on the Forums then.
i have 20 accounts
i have 20 accounts.
…Cool.