I said it was a choice between getting a new PC (which ended up being around $800) and affording bills.
You took that to mean I’m having to choose between $15 a month or bills.
You seem to have a recurring issue with putting words in people’s mouths and twisting things around. You should stop doing that.
Now, full disclosure, I was under the impression you needed multiple computers as well for each account and couldn’t have multiple instances of WoW running on one PC, so if that’s not the case anymore $15/month is not a big deal if it’s something you really want to do, but I was going off the basis you’d need to invest in a dedicated machine for each account.
If I’m wrong about that then I’m wrong, and a quick google search confirms that I was indeed wrong, but I’m also someone capable of changing my perspective when presented with new information that makes sense.
So I will agree the financial implications are not overly significant (although I’d still wince at paying any more than one extra subscription fee, IF I was going to multibox). And with that, y’all have a good night
So we are still not passed this. I thought we were since you didn’t object to the statements and you didn’t explain why they were wrong.
All groups have an unfair advantage over one person playing one account that isn’t grouped. Do you understand this? Or are you having an issue with the statement? If you are, please explain why because you stated “groups arent an unfair system”. I’m stating that multiboxers have an unfair advantage over one person playing one account just like a group of players have an unfair advantage over one person playing one account. There is no difference in terms of unfairness.
My point still stands. If someone can’t afford $15 at the end of the month they shouldn’t be gaming at all. At this point we’re just nattering over minutiae.
Almost converted. Start with dual boxing. You’ll be sold. Hotkeynet, a decent graphics card with a relatively modern CPU and a bunch of RAM is all you need. Extra display(s) always help though.
I wouldn’t really rely on Wikipeda quotes personally, considering how it’s a free open platform for anybody to put anything up there and even edit things freely.
I know this has nothing to do about this what were talking about right now, but i have noticed your skipped my 3 comments replying to the topic of money that you bought up.
Just seems kinda odd that you can’t answer those comments and correct me if theirs anything wrong, should i take it that my math on it was correct?
Well, you don’t need more then one computer or upgrade a lot if your willing to tone down the graphics to super low to accommodate 4 other accounts running at the same time. That’s what i did in the past.
Why do you need more then $15 a month to enjoy WoW?
If you want to spend more then $15, go ahead, but why it has to be a need or else your considered broke or financially troubled?
Unfortunately that has zero bearing on the topic of one player with the power of multiple characters acting via a single keystroke. The level of warped lunacy you bring to this discussion makes you easily dismissed.
The frightening thing is that there are humans that genuinely think the way you do. I mean, it is so utterly bizzare.
I don’t get mad at every jerk who drives a sports car just because they spent more money on their ride, even though they can go faster than me, unless they cut me off or otherwise make things unsafe.
Not any kind of proof at all. First of all grouping is not fair to a person that is not in a group. Until you understand this basic fundamental you won’t understand why multiboxing is allowed and further why it should be allowed in all MMORPGs not just World of Warcraft, Star Wars the Old Republic, FFXIV, etc.
In all forms of PvE and PvP the group has an unfair advantage to a player that isn’t grouped. You’re arguing that any player can group and assuming this is a valid statement all of the time when it’s not. Some people aren’t in a guild. They don’t like them. Some people don’t like to use trade chat for whatever reason. Joining a group is a decision by the player and the moment the player joins a group the group has an unfair advantage over a player that isn’t in a group.
yes it is. it is 100000% fair. you wanna run solo into BRM? good luck. you will most likely get destroyed by a group of the opposite faction waiting to faceroll you. youre pathetic arguments are just costing me more real world time in order to counter them. please step up your game
It has everything to do with this discussion. A group of players not multiboxing also has an advantage over each individual player who is playing 1 character at a time. That’s a 100% correct statement and has everything to do with this.
If you prefer to change the subject to a multiboxer using one key press for actions made at the same time and compare that to a full group, by all means we can move on to that topic given that you acknowledge that groups of players also have an unfair advantage over a single player without a group.
So you agree after all even though you’re arguing against it? You as a single player would get destroyed by a group on the opposite faction so you admit that the solo player against a group is unfairly disadvantaged. In other words the full group has the advantage over that one person.
You are making no sense at all now. First you make a statement that it’s 100000% fair then proceed to explain that it’s not fair because the group destroyed the one person playing one account.
Please explain how it’s fair to the one person trying to get into BRM if there is a group of the opposite faction there obliterating the solo player? You’re claiming that’s fair??
you are convincing yourself of something that is not true. it is not true that it is an unfair advantage when multiple players group up to defeat another player or anything in that manner. if it were, that would mean every player in the game would be acting in an unfair manner. grouping is a fundamental aspect of wow and youre arguing its unfair to equivocate against my argument that paying more money than someone else to bypass grouping is unfair.
there is nothing unfair about getting steamrolled by a group because anyone can form a group of their own whereas to multibox, you must pay more money than someone else. i think this is the 7th or 8th time ive said this
I’m comparing apples to apples. Oranges to oranges. I compare the multiboxer to a full group. That’s my point. We still haven’t got passed that when making a comparison from a multiboxer with a group to one player playing one account is no difference in unfairness when a full group of players is compared to one person playing one account.
right so ive factually proven you wrong multiple times yet you pretend you are still right. at this point you are arguing something that has been proven wrong multiple times by myself.
