ahh yeah the level 58 booostssss yeeeeep totally in line with the original design philosophy yeeeeep
We have dual spec! Itâs 50g a pop!
i feel so bad
Woah, Beta, they hit this post really fast.
Watch your back, man. People here are looking for any excuse to censor you.
Iâm not one of those people, of course. I enjoy based comments.
You mean besides putting arena requirements on season 1 and 2 gear?
And starting at 0 instead of 1500?
And level 58 boosts?
And cash shop mounts?
And requiring revered reputation instead of honored for the blue pvp gear?
Besides those things, right?
Yeah, I spoke a bit hastily. Iâm not really for most of those things either, but the central point of that reply still stands.
The people that are arguing:
âItâs just one change, slippery slope is a fallacy and has no evidenceâ
Are also arguing:
âThere have already been changes, so you canât argue against further changesâ
Correct.
Blizzard hasnât set a precedent of making changes because of prior changes. They evaluate each change on its own merits. The slippery slope as defined on these forums is a fallacy.
But we can argue against further changes. Whether or not there have already been changes has no bearing on it, so you canât claim previous changes as grounds against opposing further changes.
The positions I mentioned arenât necessarily wrong but they are mutually exclusive. You canât have it both ways.
Edit: Thatâs just in terms of double standards. Add that to the resorts to personal attacks and insults some of your camp engage in and it really is clear this is just a petition - thereâs no actual discussion being had here.
You canât argue yourself out of a paper bag.
All you really have is dishonesty.
Iâve noticed you throwing this around ever since someone caught you out in a deception - clearly you thought it made good enough copy to throw at others. Groundlessly I might add.
What is duel spec
Do quote my deception please!
Some one has never heard the phrase âvocal minorityâ in this cause âinsanely annoying minorityâ
I have never played a video game that I liked 100%. All of them had flaws. I just weigh the good and the bad and if the goodsufficiently outweighs the bad Iâll continue playing. If not Iâll quit. But I live in a complex world with shades of grey everywhere. You apparently live in a black and white world.
Said the person that refuses to discuss his opinions because they are common sense and if you donât get it youâre likely autistic, because autistic people donât have common sense.
After posting that Iâm amazed you have the gall to claim other people are resorting to insults.
This is a first - I donât think anyone could accuse me of refusing to discuss my opinions in this thread lol.
Sorry, just had to point out the part you didnât include.
Happy to include that actually - an example of someone calling me autistic and then claiming I am some how in the wrong for claiming theyâre resorting to insults. By all means quote that bit. The cognitive dissonance and entitlement here is quite stark.
A tiny amount of idiots and their alts, alts such as you.
Youâre not convincing anyone. Learn 2 cope.