So thank you for confirming you are reading a graph and not the logs themselves.
Mirror, Mirror, on the wall…
2 Likes
So now the goalposts are moving. 
I thought they were bottom dps? Now it’s “they are only bottom dps on avg”…
but “feral is skewed and doesn’t count for avgs”.
Pick a lane. If top performing boomies are in the top 6 dmg(top 4 by close margins) it is not “bottom of the pack”…people are just not playing it to its potential. This also disproves the doom and gloom hyperbole “no one will take me as boomy”…as guilds are clearly doing that and those boomies who play well are on par with other top performing dps classes.
Going to keep linking this until you learn to read it:
https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/1023#aggregate=amount&sample=1&dataset=99
Ive come with data and explained it. You continue to go “nuh uh, you are lying”.
Bro, you’ve been claiming the overall is good, when, like I said, it is bottom of the pack. I’m being consistent here, other than the top 1% (which are middle of the pack), the overall is bottom.
1 Like
Tbh, I’m done responding, you’re a dense brick wall.
1 Like
Lol, LMAO even. Read this:
https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/1023#aggregate=amount&sample=1&dataset=99
Git Gud imho
You are once again, linking the top 1%
Oh look, boomy is #2 on Chogall when played well:
https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/1023#aggregate=amount&sample=1&dataset=99&boss=1029
lol
And 3rd on Sinestra when played well:
https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/1023#aggregate=amount&sample=1&dataset=99&boss=1082
Well if you knew how to read logs, and since you can only read graphs. You would understand that only Troll druids are actually hitting those numbers due to their racial for the 99th/max percentile. Troll druids topping out at like 43k dps on nef, alliance druids topping out at about 36k just as an example.
1 Like
lol, boomy is third on dbl dragons:
https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/1023#aggregate=amount&sample=1&dataset=99&boss=1032
Git Gud imho
and boomy is right next to Fire Mages on Nef:
https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/1023#aggregate=amount&sample=1&dataset=99&boss=1026
Tied with Arms on Captain Planet:
https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/1023#aggregate=amount&sample=1&dataset=99&boss=1028
4th on Alakir:
https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/1023#aggregate=amount&sample=1&dataset=99&boss=1034
This literally isn’t helping your case at all if you are trying to prove “I can read logs”
2 Likes
Do you actually have anything of substance or are you going to keep putting your fingers in your ears and saying “no no, you are lying, im not reading those”?
I have provided it Several times. You on the other hand continue to ignore it and keep posting useless one offs.
You are looking at logs and doing zero research into them, which means you arn’t reading them. You see a number on a top parse and call it a day without understanding WHY it is what it is or understanding why it’s a terrible metric to base the class as a whole from.
I mean lets balance the druid around troll racial i guess? since trolls specifically are hitting those numbers and no one else, nerf the spec not the racial eh?
2 Likes
Link it in quotes then
You could say literally the same thing about any caster.
Other casters are seeing a 2-3k dps difference between troll/alliance average (fire, ele, demo, affliction, shadow) where boomy is seeing closer to a 6k difference average.
So yes every caster is affected, but not at the same level.
3 Likes
How it started:
“Boomy is the worst dps. Bottom of the barrel.”
How it is now:
“Well, sure, some boomies are performing in top dps for many fights…but but, it’s because of Troll racial!”
The cope is unreal. The intellectual dishonesty is obvious. Enjoy reading those logs I linked and coming to terms with the fact some boomies just play poorly.
Sorry fact hurt your feelings? Move along little William.
2 Likes
The irony of this projection
The only Irony taking place is you thinking what you have posted is accurate data to support a nerf.
If you can’t see how utterly wrong your take has been this entire thread then it’s hopeless and not worth the effort at this point anymore.
Maybe focus a little more on reviewing feral logs and actually understand what you are reading so you stop green parsing.
This entire thread you have been commenting on a spec you don’t even play or understand as if you have some insight into it, commenting on how performance is achieved, or trying to convey understanding in what you are looking at in the logs.
You honestly have done nothing more than prove the point of not knowing how to analyze a log and understand what you are reading. You are the equivalent of a generic google search and clicking the first link that comes up in the search and taking it for face value rather than double checking the information it provides.
3 Likes
I don’t even have logs
The data is clear. The lowest dps raid spec was given a significant nerf without documentation or communication. What I am hoping for is a clear indication of what is intended going forward.