Because MM is the easiest spec in the game to kill if you can get close and dont really do anything when sat on.
BM still probably going to be better anyway.
Because MM is the easiest spec in the game to kill if you can get close and dont really do anything when sat on.
BM still probably going to be better anyway.
I canât think of anything better than a BM hunter for harassing casters.
meanwhile epic bgs have 15 mm hunters per side
triple distilled trolling from blizz
Um⌠that is extremely low damage.
thatâs definitely a âyouâ problem only.
The same argument canât be made about rogues. They have 12 ways to live whenever someone thinks to target them. If you have trouble against hunters on your rogue thatâs on you. You have 3 ways to get a trinket turtle out of them then kill them with the other 2 ways when DR resets.
I completely hear you and generally agree, but itâs a mess blizz got themselves into when they added rated, and then on top of that more and more classes. I donât see how you can balance a game with this many class/specs.
Lol forums love to complain about MM. Maybe itâs because I switched over to BM after the buffs it got and after we lost feign dispel. That really sucked and made me prefer BM for more survivability.
nah, forums likes to complain/question the logic behind certain buffs or nerfs that donât actually fix the design flaws of a spec in pvp.
they really just looked at MM and went âyâknow what would fix this spec? a fat dmg buff to their only 2 good skills, but leave them still just as potato when theyâre being trained.â
slapping % damage buffs on stuff is the âput a lot of gorilla tape over the broken car windowâ solution. i think we can call that out.
Well buffs are buffs and these might make me switch back to playing MM, which I guess is their goal? They want us to be more of glass cannons and if we do enough damage, that can make up for lack of survivability
If enough people are crying about it, it must be fun to play >:)
You need to keep using mastery.
oooooh MM BUffs!?!
So, if the hunter were hard to kill, youâd just leave them alone and train someone else?
I think you misunderstood what I meant. Unless youâre saying rogues DON"T have good burst, cc, and mobility.
Rogues are not hard to kill. I donât think they are.
I only have trouble with hunters when they are 40 yards away and hit me with an aimed shot / rapid fire combo. This takes me down to about 20% health and then thereâs not much else I can do.
You could always vanish, evasion, stun, stun, disarm, stun, cloak, shadow step, stun, gouge, blind, vanish again, stun⌠I mean by now the hunter should be dead.
Except none of those do damage. All a hunter has to do is stay 40 yards away.
Rogues can do their full damage while being immune and keeping their target stunned.
If one class can handle hunters, it is rogue. I can kill most hunters on my rogue. Maybe you should give MM a try and see for yourself.
Im glad blizzard doesnt balance around forum players lol.
I donât disagree. But people are acting like hunters are totally defenseless and have no dps. Thatâs just not true. Hunters have stuns and ccâs just like rogues, and every other class. AND they have a 40 yard range. If a hunter is dying to a rogue, they are not using their ccâs effectively.
Iâve played against some hunters who use their ccâs properly and I can barely touch them. Iâve played against some that just kind of sit there.
51yards actually. Without sniper shot. I should be able to hit 53 soon.