Skeram was 30/70 horde. If a merger actually happened right this moment, it would be 55/45 alliance.
1 Like
As intriguing as a server merge would be, realistically it would never happen. In my personal opinion, this is situation of everyone thinking they want it, but they really donât. Not to mention that the opinions of the 20-30 (if that) Heartseeker players that I saw reply to this thread most likely arenât indicative of the overall playerbaseâs attitude about something like this. Same with Skeram.
Each sever probably has what, a little over 2,000 players? Do you really think Blizzard would make a decision that impacts thousands of people, many potentially negatively, based on the feedback from a few dozen posters on the forums? Sorry, but not likely.
Because itâs the players.
If there is fault in blizzard itâs because they tried to make everyone happy to begin with, they should of never done free xfers.
Hey Gso I know how much you love to hear from me 
Glad to see you being as useful as you ever are, complaining, crying and talking about Exit Strategy. Its almost like you canât forget about us, jealousy? Envy? who knows but thatâs not the point 
I know it might be hard for you to understand, seeing lots of long time members leave for greener pastures 
Its almost like Myat and others could be conflicted on what happened. Thats doesnât change the fact that I like brisk, I also like my guild Iâve played with for the past 2 years Love hearing stories about your miss communications
Anyways stay safe out there gamer! Donât forget to get that epic victory royal 
3 Likes
But they did. If I was horde on Stalagg and they offered me free transfers to Whitemane, I would take them in a millisecond. I would be behaving rationally based on the options given to me. Why then am I to blame if Whitemane gets ruined, and not Blizzard?
Sure, there are people whining on the forums, but there are always people whining on the forums. You canât say âthe playersâ are to blame for decisions Blizzard made just because some guy made a post on the forums. Blizzard is responsible for their decisions. And if their decision ruins a server, then it is their responsibility to fix the problem they created.
1 Like
I like the merge, a lot of people are used to roaming the world without interruption at this point. Will be a big shift in how the world feels but it makes for some great memories having it be truly contested. Finding a server with relatively even population was the reason a lot of us came to Heartseeker in the first place.
1 Like
This seems to me to be one of the most outlandish/ridiculous ideas ever, on these forums. These two servers have the faction balance they have completely due to player choice.
If, almost 2 years after their respective faction balances have been established, you do not like the faction balance on one of these servers, donât play on it.
But asking for Blizzard to step in and undo the player-driven, player-created, (OBVIOUSLY) player-desired faction balance on Heartseeker and Skeram seems like anything but, âthe right thing.â
1 Like
You sit on your terrible server stuck and expect blizzard to bail you out, they arenât going to.
Either cough up the money to fix your own problems or stay on your dead server.
1 Like
Looks like youâve given up trying to make a coherent and rational argument. Which makes me wonder, why are you so opposed to a merger, or free transfers from Skeram to Heartseeker or vice versa, or whatever? Why are you so angry? Why is creating basically another 50/50 server from two dying servers a bad thing? And why is it even your business?
1 Like
Iâm so sick of everyone not realizing this rogue is Bigsmooth. Its always been Bigsmooth, ever since day one Bigsmooth has been scheming the running this server. Did you really think Valimare was always starting sh!t with us? No, Valimare has been Smooth since the start, so we would focus on Inv ke instead of Smooths tyrannical grasp on Heartseeker. And now he sees his kingdom crumbling around him, and heâs trying to sell off all the spoonfed guildmaster accounts he can before Heartseeker implodes on itself from from cringey buff greifng overload. So you better watch yourselves, Bigsmooth comes for us all, and if you arenât careful, heâll come for you next.
3 Likes
Because it flies in the face of player agency.
I am personally against free transfers. My personal opinion is that they negatively impact far too many people, and only positively impact people who are going to complain no matter what. I do not think they should ever be implement again for the WoW Classic franchise.
An example is Heartseeker, which was a fine, healthy, low population realm prior to free transfers bringing the people it did.
50/50 servers already exist, and at this stage of the game, anyone who actually wants that, should already be on one.
For the same reason it is anybodyâs who is on this forum. We pay a subscription to be part of the community.
To bad the players wouldnt know how to PvP tho. (Carlton dance gif) why cant i link gifs! fix ur shlt blizzard.
2 Likes
Bigsmooth, where?!
1 Like
Just do like the one guy said and pay the $25 to xfer. Leave my server alone.
2 Likes
They already happened, and the damage has already been done.
Imagine if for one week Blizzard offered free transfers from any server to any server. Your position is that if anyone takes these transfers, and if any server gets ruined as a result, it is the fault of âthe playersâ alone.
Is that what you actually believe? Or are you just taking a principled stance against transfers, and donât care whatsoever, or even have contempt for the people on Heartseeker/Stalagg/Skeram/Incendius/etc?
Lolwut?
Itâs an interesting type of conversation where you tell someone what their opinion is, and then question it.
If youâre interested in my opinion, go ahead and read my comments.
My argument and stance is pretty coherent, I think you all should either be stuck on your server you chose to be on or pay to xfer off. These servers have been out for 2 years, if you are unhappy by all means xfer off at your expense.
I have said this throughout this whole topic, not sure why itâs incoherent?
1 Like
Iâve read your comments, but they lack logic. There is no functional difference between a free transfer and a paid transfer. They could theoretically have exactly the same outcome. Incendius was originally ruined by paid transfers.
Whether someone transfers off for free, or has to pay Blizzard to transfer, it doesnât on its own change the outcome. Thus if free transfers are bad, then paid transfers are bad.
The only reason paid transfers are different than free transfers, is that the vast majority of players are unwilling to pay. So Iâm a bit confused why youâre advocating for people paying to transfer.
You donât actually want them paying to transfer, you want them to suffer.
I oppose. The heartseeker alliance are a bunch of babys that can barely handle 5 horde on the entire server. They are going to explode if all of a sudden there is 2000
3 Likes
Indeed. I am not a proponent of transfers in any capacity.
Hmm. Iâm confused why youâre advocating sushi on ice-cream, but I guess to each their own 
Ah! Thatâs an interesting thing to suggest! Players have agency. They have used it, and natural faction balance and populations have developed across servers.
If I had rolled on Heartseeker or Skeram because I enjoy the faction balance and population styles they have, and then Blizzard said, âNope. You should play like others play elsewhere, but where you decided explicitly not to play.â I wouldnât feel happy.
Nobody has to suffer when there is player agency. We are free to play where we want.
1 Like