It’s not entirely one-sided. 49.3% are completely against sharding while 30.7% accept it only under the condition Blizzard stated of first weeks and starting areas only.
Another 14.7% wish they found another solution which implies they will tolerate it. And only 5.3% have no problems with any form of sharding used at any time.
There is the underlying concern that if this goes through then there will be similar situations for mass gatherings in major cities and special events where hundreds of players might be together at once. Hopefully, the starting zones is all that’s needed and people can begrudgingly tolerate it instead of waiting weeks to start playing. Or another solution can be found but ones that have been proposed (waiting in queue) aren’t necessarily that popular either.
Actually that would be 80%. 50 + 30 = 80. I’d argue you can include the 14.7% as well because of the way the stawpolll question was worded. Sharding is indeed very unpopular. Vanilla was about community and working together. Seeing the people in the world and not having people on PVP realms vanishing.
Same deal with flying. There was a popular poll done where the person (for some stupid reason) asked if flying should be in classic. 95% said NO. I think they even asked about LFD. It had some dumb questions.
The sharding one bothers me. The “No sharding. I’d rather sit in queue or I won’t play at all until sharding is gone.” specifically. There is no choice for shard-supporters who wouldn’t play until queues are gone. I do not like that anti sharding folks like myself are given a choice of not playing until the non-vanilla mechanic is gone. Make supporters of sharding wait a few weeks.
The option should be shortened to “I’d rather sit in a queue” Full Stop.
The loot trading question should have the option of “OK with loot trading ONLY when master loot option is used”. The first and fourth options have significant overlap causing vote splitting.
When we were joking around the other night about the chair on the porch and cane lol. I was a bit surprised but after reading the TOS, I guess I was in the wrong.
Another poster that confuses trolling with comments they disagree with? Is there some specific part that makes it irresistible that you must take the bait?
Quite honestly I would have preferred they not have given a launch commitment. I believe it was, along with the combined subs decision, purely to staunch the retail sub hemorrhage.
If they didn’t give summer 2019 time frame they could have used the beta time frame instead. Send out invites to build hype and also to gauge potential launch day numbers. (Not precise I know but if their expectations are way off it will be obvious).
Even if they would have reopened the demo. It’d be a safer route.
We are sitting at 9 months max. Beta window is getting very tight.
Agreed.
They should have lovingly fallen back on the “soon!” meme. I mean we waited and hoped for 10 years, we could have waited without a launch target but safe in the knowledge that it was going to happen.