Well that complaint seems to stem from the speed at which people try to remove the prompt, rather than them hitting yes.
If that’s true, that means people will just hurry to kick no to get the prompt off the screen, which isn’t really a better situation than just hitting yes to get it off the screen.
If the complaint is that no one reads the prompt to see who they’re kicking and if they agree with the reason, they shouldn’t be allowed to vote no immediately either, that wouldn’t address the complaint. They should be made to read the name and reason, and vote after being informed. That’s the only thing that addresses the complaint of people not reading the name or reason.
I wouldn’t argue against these changes. I would suggest adding a confirmation warning. That’s standard in game development as well as web applications.
Unfortunately when people post video proof of their “innocence”, it often shows them to be even more at fault than we first thought. And it turns into even more of an argument of lack of accountability on the one who was kicked.
We’ve seen plenty of vods where op will defend it tooth and nail. Yet it shows countless mistakes and the group were saints for not kicking them sooner.
The number is exaggerated, but when a lot of us do hundreds, thousands of dungeons and we rarely see this…
That’s why I assign such a low value.
As far as twinks go. They are definitely rare, but most appreciate the speed runs.
If you want to avoid them. I’d suggest running later in the week when most have finished their weekly quests.
Oh yes I am aware. I’ve been around for a long time here but I do appreciate the explanation. I’m a web developer and have a pet peeve on naming conventions is all. The name of the debuff isn’t really an issue worth patching imo.
A valid point to consider. I cannot prove my innocence to you but I believe it to be beside the point. The point is it’s abusable.
Why on earth would someone chatGPT this? What an odd thing to say.
And if you aren’t telling us the whole truth, or you’re straight up lying, that is entirely the point. If the so called “abuse” isn’t even happening frequently enough to be of concern, then there’s no point in changing it just because someone can make up a story about something that could happen.
Man I really do miss my timewalking twink. It was fun to build a timewalking set with shadowmourn, bunch of Op set bonuses, and trinket effects. My issue on that topic is that none of that is worth it if everything is blown out of the water by level 10s. You just afk and auto run behind them.
I did 3 timewalkings today. 2 had lvl 10 tanks just pulling everything. the 3rd was the one i was booted from.
I am aware. If bliz didnt look at the others, I will be another voice in the crowd. Perhaps they’ll look when it’s loud enough.
You’re not loud, you’re just annoying because this is spam. They’ve officially stated that this is not an abusable function of the game. If a group doesn’t want you in it, they have every right to remove you.
You have the tools to avoid this, just form your own group.
If they are level 10, they might just be leveling.
Twinks are hardlocked at 11.
But if you really want to know. A geared 80 is more op.
You should see how fast this hunter clears dungeons lol. I don’t have the self healing to pull, but I can easily out dps those lvl 11 wars lol.
Keep in mind, they use their own metrics to decide these types of decisions.
When VTK went live, in three months, they added the debuff based on their metrics.
When people were leaving after the first boss of that dungeon over a stupid trinket, they added the debuff based on their metrics.
A few people on a forum of roughly 1% of the playerbase complain they got kicked from a dungeon and we see this from time to time over years… and Blizzard metrics have shown them nothing to change.
No, it’s not. There are two other ‘fix the kick abuse’ posts just in the last few hours, lol. You’re spamming the same thing that’s already been discussed countless times on this forum. Literally the definition of spam.
but I do appreciate the explanation. I’m a web developer and have a pet peeve on naming conventions is all. The name of the debuff isn’t really an issue worth patching imo.