I made clear I donât like it when leaders kill civilians. Iâm saying Alliance act like their faction and the people in it are always right.
No civilians that didnât opt to stay there were killed iirc.
And ofc destroying an alliance settlement is okay so long as there isnât willful killing of civilians.
Itâs war.
Itâs why I donât whine because the alliance destroyed Taurajo, again, another instance of alliance wiping out civilians indiscriminately.
I specifically cited that as the reason, well the main one, that I donât like Sylvanas. Thereâs not any other horde character that agreed with the decision, not even Nathanos, whom we saw hesitate to follow orders for the first and only time.
Sylvanas is trash and needs to be rid of.
All civilians were evacuated prior to this occuring.
Military target, with no civilian losses, sounds like war to me.
Horde did nothing wrong there.[quote=âTarquinius-dalaran, post:53, topic:154648â]
Being the first to weaponize Azerite was totally okay too right?
[/quote]
Yes, why wouldnât they?
No, I think every player loved watching Garrosh throw him off a cliff for killing of the druids, which were peaceful and neutral. I think Garrosh described it as disgusting, which I agree with.
And that Orc was a previously unknown general put there for questing purposes, heâs hardly representative of horde leadership.