Jerk is not a protected class? I’m not siding with anyone but this person is a jerk because they have different views? Interesting…
The social contract says essentially don’t be a jerk, and if someone feels like they are being discriminated by telling them that, that’s them self identifying.
Ultimately if the contract was vague then its up to the person’s interpretation. You viewed it one way and they viewed it another.
So, ultimately is if it was the other way, because you don’t agree with them that would make you a jerk as well, right?
Agreed. My problem is with the use of “social contract”. It historically aligns with one side of a liberalism society (a liberalism society included both collective and individual laws).
Jerk is a protected class in America. 1st amendment… A ton of jerks out there.
First amendment only protects you from government…nothing else. First amendment isn’t a right to be a jerk to everyone, and definitely isn’t protection from others silencing you, getting rid of your voice on their platform etc. I would suggest reading something before saying it does something.
No. I have tried more than anything in expressing my opinion to be polite, tactful, and respectful. Even apologizing where needed.
Yes… There is a lot more to that though.
Yes. But it stops the American government from acting against jerks when it comes to speech.
Yes. That would fall under different law due to the use of physical force/violance to silence someone.
I have read it, many times. Keep a little pocket book to reference.
The American government does not run World of Warcraft, fortunately.
Where is the government here in this transaction? Last I checked it isn’t the government making you sign this agreement.
Its not physical violence by preventing you in accessing something bud.
Apparently you have comprehension issues then. Especially if you think somehow it applies on a online video game.
Well yah. You are taking the response out of the context it was in if just use it that way.
Hunters would be happy if they did, they definitely would have lots of guns then.
I’m not sure what context you think that what you said would be relevant in.
Its in the context of the player agreement, so no…they are not wrong. You are.
What?!?!?! Yah, private company. Private company, please change your policy and turn ‘social contract’ into something else that does not involve political theory.
It seemed like you were inferring physical force/violence is all. Yep, telling someone they aren’t welcome because of their opinions, looks, skin… isn’t anything new.
Lol. We moved away from the original context… That comment is even further away.
I suspect you have some mental health issues if you’re that hung up over exact phrasing.
It’s none of my business but I suggest re-considering how your issues may be affecting your view on this complete non-starter of a “problem”.
Best of luck.
They don’t have to, because it doesn’t now. Only according to internet arm chair legal experts is it.
Except blizz is saying if you are a jerk you aren’t welcome and go away. That is not a problem to anyone but the jerks, and they are just an drag for everyone else.
We haven’t moved from anything champ. I have been talking in context to it from the start. You might have moved on, trying to build strawmans and attempting red herrings, but no, I have been talking about this contract the entire time.
No. The discussion moved from government action back to private company action. Two different things.
Show me where in the Social Contract it says anything about “opinions, looks, skin”? And no, disallowed speech is not the same thing as “disallowed opinion”.
Lol people will stop talking about this in a couple weeks and something new will be complained about.
My lord. Act like they’re signing away their lives with an I accept button.
Drama queens.
No, you brought up first amendment, , then I talked about it in context of this, which isn’t applicable. You really should get off the forums, go talk to someone man. Maybe while lying down on a couch. Get those issues sorted.