It kinda boils down to the same thing though.
“You shouldn’t post here/your opinion doesn’t matter cause it’s not a classic avatar”
“You’re opinion is wrong/doesn’t matter because you pvp rating isn’t high enough”
“Come back when you’ve cleared mythic and then I’ll consider your opinion”
All seem to equal about the same thing to me, someone arbitrarily deciding when others are allowed to have an opinion on a given topic.
More logical fallacies I see. Let me know when you can have a conversation without ad hominem Thanks.
On a side note, not that I owe you an explanation, but I am a 39 year old married business owner with three children. Not a “basement dweller”.
Also, Zeromus was better than Zemus, and VI is better than IV.
Did I completely imagine the entire pre-classic period of this forum, where the moderators routinely moved anti classic threads out of GD, and dumped them into the classic specific forum? Was that just a fever dream, or detox from too much IPA?
If there was an actual lack of bias in the moderation, the same thing would be happening likewise, with anti-BFA threads being forcibly moved into GD from here.
And that has very little to do with the point.
Which is that just posting on a classic character lends almost no validity to what someone is saying. Especially if the only requirement is a level 10 character.
Yet, it does. Simply because a level 10 is going to be automatically assumed to not be a real player if suggesting major changes to classic etc.
This idea would thin out the weeds for sure. Lots of weeds in this thread fighting the weed eater.
i draw the line at lvl 36 hunters not being “real” players…
What is an anti-classic thread?
That’s fine, because I will be 60 in a couple weeks.
To some, ANY thread that didn’t show “Classic” in a positive light or those advocating changes.
how about you simply take every post on its merits - you don’t need blizzard to put in arbitrary rules on who can post. especially since many people have already shown you how they can be circumvented at little trouble to the superposed troll - think about it rationally… if someone is willing to waste their time trolling they are certainly going to put in minimal effort required to post in the forum.
No because then pandas can’t post
There is nothing negative about discluding Pandas.
Segregation as a word has gotten an unjust stigma, and people use it poorly because of that only exacerbating the problem. Segregation has it’s place, you’re not going to keep the lions and gazelle in the same pen at a zoo are you?
That’s racist.
(yes, that was sarcasm)
^See what I mean?
You have to feed the lion somehow… Pandas need food
“Which is that just posting on a classic character lends almost no validity to what someone is saying.”
Or they play both??? lol…