“the hero shall write the tale, and the vanquished become its villain.” - Emet-Selch
Emet was indeed a villain but one that was wrtitten so well and one we could understand in regards to motive. but non the less, he tried to kill us and millions of others because he “did not consider us fully alive so he wouldn’t be guilty of murder if he killed you” :3
And it’s wrong, the game that has you to be ALL fine as it should be.
Not for one small thing it affects, for another it doesn’t, it’s not like that… And these little things make it look bad, be careful, don’t live on the 10.0 honeymoon right now this character is another Zooval, who only came out to die.
You can’t say that the DF is not just about the lore,WRONG, it’s the same as someone saying that it’s not about the gameplay, WoW HAS TO HAVE EVERYTHING IF NOt PROBLEM, and for something small that falls everything falls apart and that goes happen if it continues like this in the next patch, and that is not good.
Why would he? Fyrrak just wanted to bathe in some shadowflame, free most of the Elders and burn the country side. The Incarnates had no use for Aberrus outside of luring the Sundered Flame to it to serve as a distraction. Aberrus isn’t the final raid of the expansion. We got least one more with 10.2
People acting like Aberrus is the final raid are weird. If you wanted a cliffhanger cinematic, you got one in Vault. This raid is akin to Throne of Thunder or Ulduar. The raid featuring the secondary antagonist of the expansion.
Exactly why the Incarnates knew that the sundered flame was following them and allowed them to get to Aberrus. Sarkareth was merely an unwilling tool in their schemes as a distraction.
1 Like