The people who write the rules disagree with you - end of story.
That would indicate they would be enforcing the rule in this case, which we all know they wonât.
True, but the question wasnât will he be punished, it was is it considered griefing. By blizzardâs rules it unambiguously is. In reality heâll probably get away with it like most of the people who buy gold in classic.
It really isnât unambiguous though.
It really is though. Intentionally MCing someone to death during a non Makgora duel is griefing by Blizzardâs own words.
Iâm sure some morons will try to twist into knots pretending it wasnât intentional in the same way that they were pretending TinyViolin pulled the boss to the wrong corner, but everyone knows it is. The OP post doesnât even pretend it was an accident.
Go ahead and prove intent.
Youâre right, people accidentally mind control people off cliffs all the time. Just like TinyViolin accidentally went to the wrong corner. We all believe that too, sport.
I wouldnât think so⌠If youâre in a dual, anything goes I imagineâŚ
Itâs not griefing if itâs hilarious. If someone is dumb enough to duel you near a cliff they deserve what happens.
Accepting the duel is giving consent. Whatever the outcome of the duel are the consequences. Unfortunately the player didnât use common sense and caught perma death as a result. Seems more like a case of wanting to make a bad decision, accept zero consequences for it, then whinge about it on forums.
Also the rules are ambiguous around this topic because you cannot prove intent vs for example a lock dropping an infernal in trade district.
The rules are not ambiguous, they are perfectly clear. Enforcement might be questionable, but intentionally MCing a person in a non MakâGora duel is objectively griefing by their own wording. You do not âconsentâ to death in a non fatal duel. There is no plausible explanation for âoh no the other guy jumped off that cliff while I was in control of his character.â Plus the OP didnât even phrase it as unambiguous, he asked if it was griefing. It is. Will he get in trouble for it? Unlikely.
Also, how is it a case of someone âwhinging about it on forumsâ when the victim is not even participating in the conversation, it was the ostensible griefer (who was âasking for a friendâ) who initiated it.
Itâs not an ambiguous statement they were very clear.
Your argument is simply factually wrong. They state 3 specific things, duel to the death, PvP flagging and war games. PvP flagging is a specific defined game mechanic in which you flag for PvP by typing /pvp to be able to attack members of the opposite faction. Your argument holds zero weight because normal dueling is not PvP flagging by definition.
Again, it is not an ambiguous statement open to interpretation. They were VERY CLEAR that intentionally killing another player outside of those very 3 limited and very specific circumstances is against their policy for the mode.
As far as Blizzard goes, itâs one of the most unambiguous policies theyâve ever stated. They stated it as clearly as it could be stated. There are 3 specific exceptions to when you can kill someone in HC intentionally and a normal duel is very clearly not one of them.
Highlighting for emphasis, before somebody asks âbut what if I duel someone and they coincidentally die when on low HPâ?
No itâs not, itâs using the same article you are. So unless thatâs not a good source; my argument is just fine. Your interpreting what Blizz says differently than others does not make them inherently wrong.
" and malicious player killing outside of consensual PvP will not be tolerated on Hardcore realms"
Is from that same article. Please explain how a duel isnât consensual PvP.
Just because it goes on to give some specifics does not mean that list is all encompassing or that you can decide what it means and everyone else has to live by it.
If you die to a duel and want to report them, go for it; Blizzard will decide if the other person did anything wrong or not.
But if you choose to duel and end up dead on HC; you shouldnât come crying to the forums about how unfair it is when all you had to do was say no in the first place.
That thing that literally no one has done.
but hear me out. what if the personâs eyesight is bad and they canât really tell field of depth?
Expressio unius est exclusio alterius.
A legal principle meaning the expression of one thing is to the exclusion of the other.
We can reasonably infer that the express mention of the three types of legitimate PvP on HC realms are to the exclusion of all others.
Prove that it wasnât an accident.
This entire argument is likely pointless since I doubt this even will come up much butâŚ
No, you are not using the article as it is written, youâre trying to take pieces of it and say âthis is ambiguousâ when it literally unambiguously states in part of the same article there are only 3 exceptions to where you can intentionally kill another player and a normal duel is not one of them.
Itâs 100% griefing. The priest deliberately mcâd the other player off the cliff, knowing the other player would die. They basically started the duel with the intention to kill said player. Itâs not a friendly duel when one player has sinister motives.