Catering to people who only care about gear is precisely what led to retail. That is not what classic is about. Classic is supposed to make you work for it.
So you also claim the only reason anyone prefered 1.12 AV was because it was a faster way to get the rep gear?
It couldnât possibly be because of the exact reasons blizzard stated when they announced they were using 1.12 AV and the exact reasons why it was changed in the first place during vanilla?
Many people genuinely just didnât enjoy the earlier version.
Blizzardâs reasoning was âwe know what you want better than you.â The feedback clearly contradicts that. And it was changed for the same reason honor was changed to a currency: so people can get the gear before TBC comes out.
Aside from gear, I donât see why people would enjoy the new AV if they didnât like the old one. They just took out things people liked without fundamentally changing the format.
The reason is that it supposed to make AV marks easier to get. You see before BC came out, they changed the honour system from the bell curve grindfest to a currency system - you hand in marks and honour for gear. They had to make AV similar game lengths to the other BGs so theyd be equal so the output of AV marks would be similar to wsg and Ab marks
Exactly but people who do av donât do it for the honor. Itâs kind of like a niche type of pvp. It was its own unique thing and thatâs why everyone loved it. I remember the first day it came out I was in awe would love to experience it again
The feedback from a handful of people contradicts that, but the overwhelming feedback during vanilla was to push towards 1.12 AV which weâre getting.
And the last major change to AV was actually 1.11 which pre dates the BC pre patch by more than 1.12. So it canât even be attributed to prepping for BC or anything like that.
Look at Blizzardâs initial 1.12 AV announcement thread, and all the threads linking to it. Youâre being willfully ignorant to call it a âhandful of people.â Itâs far more than anyone saying they prefer 1.12, let alone for the gameplay.
Yes many people whined for easier gear at some point in vanilla, and again that mentality is what led to retail. Old AV is more relevant to now, and to the classic experience that people are looking for.
Get your retail nonsense out of here. Battlegrounds are about everyone being on the same playing field, regardless of what their personal objectives are. Not only is old AV truer to the vanilla experience, and evidently more widely preferred, but it also forces the gear grinders to work harder for it, which again, is far more âclassic.â 1.12 AV is on the same level of afking in warfronts. And before you claim that you afk more in the longer AVs, no, you afk more when itâs faster honor to just lose in 5 minutes than win in 10. (sorry I have to keep editing, my sub has 15 minutes left)
Youre living in lala land if you think ppl wouldnt take the path of least resistance. If they added LFG or LFR to classic almost everyone would use those features.
Even though ppl enjoy aspects of games they wont do it if it didnt rewars them properly
The three major iterations of AV, original, after first nerf wave, and 1.11 AV all existed for very similar durations in vanilla. And 1.11 AV existed longer than the original. So no 1.11 is just as true to vanilla as any other version.
No a lot of people complained about the earlier versions for the exact same reason blizzard changed AV, there were too many NPCâs and they were too strong.
The âoriginalâ didnât exist for long at all. Either 1.5 or 1.8 are the most representative of vanilla, and not fundamentally different like 1.11. When they neutered the NPCs down to a skeleton crew, AV was homogenized with the other BGs and lost its appeal. Signing off, hope Blizz sees the light.
But the 1.11 version existed for just about as long at the 1.8 version during vanilla.
So you canât even make the same argument people use against CRBGâs. Sorry but 1.11 AV was there for a major chunk of AVâs lifespan and not just a quick addition at the end.