When people talk about “Activision”, they are not talking about the game developer per se. They are talking about Bobby Kotock and others from Activision that became leadersship of Activision-Blizard when Vivendi merged Activision with Vivendi Games. These former executives of Activision do have a geat say as to what goes on at Blizzard.
These former executives of Activision do have a geat say as to what goes on at Blizzard.
No, they dont.
Im ready for an MMO from someone without “california values”… Maybe a Texas based MMO,
So the CEO and primary shareholder have no input to how a company is run? Glad to see you have not changed a bit.
There is a huge middle ground between
and
I wish people would stop with the “What? You disagreed with what I said? So that much mean you believe the extreme polar opposite!”
Thanks for this but it is not the first time me an Aehl have been down this road. We have a long hisory of being polar opposites…on this subject as well.
This just happens on a regular daily basis here. I guess I didn’t look at any previous connections between the people talking.
won’t happen, to make it happen you would need to buy blizz out of activision merger. This isn’t bungie situation where it was a simply publishing contract. Blizz and activision merged with activision as majority partner; essentially activision owns blizzard.
Nope. We don’t need more resources taken from wow.
So the CEO and primary shareholder have no input to how a company is run? Glad to see you have not changed a bit.
Nope. They dont direct Blizzard game design and never have. Blizzard runs their own show and always have.
How do i know?
- Theres a Blue post by Bornakk…sorry…Ythisens…that states this for a fact
and
- Activision has an office in Sydney, I had occasion to talk to them on an unrelated matter and they said the same.
We have a long history of being polar opposites on this subject as well.
We have never discussed this matter at all, actually.
What you BELIEVE is not necessarily what is TRUE, Solaru. Like your continued comments we would never get Aussie servers because there werent enough of us to warrant it.
Actually you are also the one who said we should never get “appear offline” as “we didnt need it”.
Oops,
And now this:
So, I will repost what was said.
and
Activision is just a publisher.
Blizzard develops and publishes their own games.
and
Activision-Blizzard is a stock holding company
Activision is an independent developer under that stock holding company
Blizzard is an independent developer under that sock holding company
King Games is an independent developer under that stock holding company
MLG is a Esports promoter under that stock holding company
Blizzard publishing (?) is an independent publishing company focused on movies, books, tv shows etc. under that holding company.
The end.
Agreed! Let the simpletons believe what they want.
If I owned a majority in a company, better believe I’ll have my say. It’s just how the world works.
Lol /10 characters
I take it you dont know how companies work.
Thats okay , i do.
Could be good. Really curious to see how Bungie does with Destiny without Activision breathing down their necks.
If they bought it during Wrath, then that just means they hadn’t yet had time to really sink their hooks in and Blizzard was able to work without their full input yet.
Well, Solaru?
Ive posted solid facts to refute your claims…floor’s all yours.
Hell no, it would just be a money sucking grindfest loot n shoot roulette dopamine casino fuelled toxic dump. They are way too poisoned with commercial greed compared to what Blizz was around Warcraft 3 Diablo 2 era. Thankfully theres already way better mmo’s and games around already.
Really, like what?
Nice passive aggressive bait attempt. It would be pointless to name anything as the fan boi blinded blizz bois would all come out of the woodwork. The fact is BFA is bad, millions leaving, 3.1 on metacritic, streamers leaving, the most toxic forums on the internet. If you cant see through that thats on you.
How are you going to say there are better MMOs out there and not mention one?