I’d appreciate it if you could go into a little more detail about exactly what you mean by “extreme prejudice,” when you’re talking about the guild’s military RP content. I get the general notion of riding far edge limits of honor to make sure that the Horde wins the war because it’s facing an existential threat to it’s existence and “when faced with extinction, every alternative is preferable.” But to be frank… I’ve heard a few stories about some pretty graphic subject matter in military guilds from both factions and I’m really not interested in a guild that crosses certain lines.
I believe that this guild is meant to satisfy players looking for a war-crime-y guild
I appreciate the desire for clarity, so I will try to be as specific as I can:
There are many people in the Horde community who see Sylvanas’s actions against the Alliance as incredibly horrific. Burning Teldrassil to the ground with civilians still inside or blighting her own troops to raise as footsoldiers during the Battle of Lordaeron are just a few of many. Horde players who resonate very strongly with Thrall’s vision, where Orcs/Tauren can get along with the Alliance if left to their own devices, have been rightfully put off this expansion and most likely side with Saurfang’s perspective. These players may not be the best fit for my guild, though I encourage them to seek out Kor’kron Legion or the Varokar Vanguard instead. I’ll be looking to work with these guilds in the future, and I’d enjoy RPing that dynamic out! Still, it’s my hope to possibly convince many of these Thrall sympathizers that… well, maybe Sylvanas has a point.
***Braces for the inevitable rotten fruit and vegetable barrage. ***
I think a major problem with the current Horde storyline is that, frankly, Blizzard explained Sylvanas’s perspective incredibly poorly. We see the consequences of her actions rather than the motives behind it. The closest we get to the latter is a small block of text in a “blink or you’ll miss it” moment where she flatly explains that the Horde and Alliance are incompatible with one another. Sylvanas is definitely manipulative and scheming, but also a deadly pragmatist — an appropriate characteristic for an Undead character, in my opinion. In her eyes, the Alliance will never accept her people (and historically never have) and so how possibly can the Horde ever be at peace with the Alliance?
This launches into an overall theme for the Warcraft storyline that I feel is lost on many people: The Horde and Alliance have been at war for almost an entire generation with minor truces here and there. After the defeat of the Old Horde, the Alliance literally enslaved the Orcs. The Alliance have been vehemently “racist” towards the undead due to the Scourge, and arguably have the legitimacy to see the Forsaken as a mere arm of the Scourge. The list goes on, but I bring these examples up to remind people why the Horde and Alliance have legitimate reasons to distrust and war with each other. Blizzard, unfortunately, tends to undersell those themes (even in this expansion, which is dumb, IMO) when the Horde and Alliance continuously team up for the sake of trumping another existential threat. However, that’s a thread all in of itself so I’ll stop harping on it. Let me now directly address both of your concerns by answering this budding question:
Is your guild all about those spicey war crimes?
Sort of, but let me explain.
I want to knock a few things out of the way immediately: I have a zero tolerance policy OOCly for “war crimes” that fall under blatant sexual violence or child violence. A rule of thumb I follow is if it isn’t a theme Blizzard would touch, neither do I. Some roleplayers go beyond that, and frankly, I just don’t want writers like that in my guild.
However, when broadening the context of “war crimes” to violence against the opposing faction, this is where it gets more complex. My guild would be totally fine razing down a relatively defenseless Alliance village, similar to what you see with Brennadam in-game. From the Alliance perspective, the Horde attack at Brennadam feels barbaric. From the Horde perspective, the attack could be plausibly explained off as a necessity because Brennadam is likely a major supplier of food/resources in the Alliance war effort.
If we choose a more controversial example, my guild would probably support the use of the Blight at Lordaeron. The Blight is a horrific biochemical weapon, but according to the Old Soldier cinematic, we’re left with the impression that the Horde was genuinely at a disadvantage and possibly could have faced annihilation considering how much of the Horde’s leadership was stationed there. The Blight was a necessity to ensure the Horde’s survival, even if Saurfang wasn’t that happy about it, and arguably, Sylvanas did the right thing by following through on Vol’jin’s desire to ensure that the Horde “did not die” that day.
So, yes, my guild will be led by a main universe Blackrock Orc who’s grown up in a rather harsh environment. A good parallel for him is Malkorok, minus the Orc racism and willingness to drink the Old God juice. Blackrocks come from a harsh, militaristic society and typically see Thrall as too soft for a Horde leader. My character is currently aligned in that mindset and agrees that the Horde and Alliance are incompatible. To my Orc, Orgaz, he believes the only way to ensure the Horde’s survival is to crush the Alliance. Does that mean he wants to tie prisoners up and use them as target practice like Garrosh’s ilk in the Siege of Orgrimmar? No. Granted, Orgaz is still a brute and he’d discourage that level of sadistic violence more so because he sees torturing defenseless prisoners with no real gain in mind as weak behavior. What’s impressive about clocking a guy with an arrow if he can’t even move? Orgaz is more of the, “Give the prisoners weapons and let them fight each other for our amusement,” type of Orc. And before anyone spears me for that, the Horde literally have a gladiator arena in Orgrimmar for entertainment purposes.
So yeah, I hope that answers some of your concern Crystalette. I apologize for the massive wall, but I definitely wanted to make the distinction of how I view or intend to approach certain “darker” themes with my guild concept. I’m aware of the more public approach requiring a sense of finesse, and I prefer to be more tasteful in my writing, even if I’m writing for a visceral, bellicose character.