Who accepts it? Reluctantly tolerating inevitability of Blizzard cutting costs on servers and support, because it can’t be any other way nowadays, and accepting gameplay changes are 2 different things.
Also, I guess you’ve missed the no-sharding threads popping up daily?
If i take an arrow to the knee and am silenced for a few days don’t let the gbank banner hit the ground!
Keep those logic mortars firing and stay within the CoC!
There are a lot of singular issues that won’t push the decision from Yes to No by themselves. Just because guild banks are one of those doesn’t mean they should be in or it doesn’t matter. If too many of these inauthentic small things are added then eventually Classic will be totally different from Vanilla. The combined weight of many small issues could eventually tip the scale.
mm I know em… What is facts, is that people don’t need to cry when a gbank is added in. What is facts, is that it is a very very small change that doesn’t necessarily destroy classic as a whole. Those are the facts I had pushed.
But that’s again, your opinion. It would ruin classic for other people and you can’t have verifiable evidence so it by definition isn’t a fact. Maybe go back to middle school and you’ll learn that one bud.
classic… makes no sense. Classic is mostly the lore/leveling experience anyways. You along with your nochange goons need to go back to the sandlot “bud”
NOTE: I’ve never been opposed to them on the “no change” principal. My concerns have always been about the time spent and the potential mistakes possible to make. I do not support them, but my usual guild behavior is making my own, so bank alts are easy.