And that effects gameplay? How is it easier for AH players if they store their things in their guild bank? Its a community you bind with that makes a so called guild. If they implement a bank for that guild, what is the hurt in it to you? Why cry and just not play the game because of it? So no, you are wrong in that it doesn’t effect YOUR gameplay at all my friend
Then not having it doesn’t affect your gameplay either.
/thread
4 Likes
You make no sense. It allows a community in which YOUR guild to store things in their for other players and friends in that guild. Why are people crying about it when it only helps the guild just a tad bit. Literally isn’t used for anything other then a utility bag to hold stuff in for your friends. THATS it
1 Like
Economics is gameplay. That’s a change. Multiple pro changers have said “it takes gold from economy” that’s a change. It’s not authentic. One change has ripple effects.
4 Likes
Yeah that’s my point buddy. So why cry about it and say its a deal breaker lol. You just walked right into that one
1 Like
It allows 1-person guilds, which every AH player has, to store a lot of items and efficiently play on AH because then you can vacuum or flood the AH easily and don’t even need to mess with bank-twinks.
It’s funny how “veterans” don’t remember what happened with the AH when Guild Banks were introduced in TBC.
2 Likes
having a gbank takes gold from the economy? Because your guild can have funds to give to other players who need it? what LMAO
1 Like
That we do soldier. That we do.
Good work out there people.
Keep it up.
Hey man, just trying to do my best to stop people from cryin bout a gbank that helps people
1 Like
They’ll prob supervise it and make rules so it doesn’t happen again. Even still it isn’t a big deal and not a dealbreaker lol. But if that’s the way yall wanna think then good riddance. Don’t ruin it for other people
1 Like
Guild banks cost gold to open more tabs. You clearly are lacking in memory. I’ll help you out. Go watch the classic panel were they said Classic = authentic vanilla
4 Likes
Exactly. Don’t ruin the game for other people. Stop pushing for the features that aren’t part of vanilla and never were.
4 Likes
Anywho, adios crybabies. Have fun on ya Pservers and retail while I go play classic, with nothing that effects MY gameplay or anybody elses hahahahaha
Who said I was pushing for it tho, I never said I wanted it. Go read my posts
Aka no guild banks and no QoL
5 Likes
It does change gameplay though right? In a tiny, infinitesimal way, the game is different. You can go and click into a guild bank for additional storage, instead of mailing stuff to a guild alt or your own alt. That’s a different way of playing the game.
You can spam “does it affect gameplay” all you want… The answer is categorically yes it does. Adding it would make the game different.
5 Likes
Fun thing is that it’s usually a trade mark of pirate servers in MMOs to mix and match features and create “custom” experience. I don’t think that’s what Blizzard is planning to do yet you push for it.
Id assume the same since they states classic = authentic vanilla
okay well im not talking in that way, good way of putting it tho. I give you that. Im saying that people don’t need to cry for this extremely small “change” and straight up not play the game because of it lol. That’s all. Didn’t ever say I was for or against it. Just don’t need or want people to cry about it and not play the game because of THAT of all things
When I signed the petition, I didn’t sign it with guild bank debates in mind. I signed it because I felt like the WoW I knew had long since disappeared. I played up until Legion, but it was the first time I quit before taking a character to max level and even with the “Come back for 7 days for free” emails that have come since then, I have no interest. But now Classic is coming back and it’s time for the debate. So here goes:
Anti: Classic is coming back and Blizzard has said they want to recreate Vanilla WoW as closely as they can. #NoChanges
Pro: True, Blizzard did say that. However, they also said that they want community feedback on how it should be. So we’re offering feedback.
A: Sure you are. Okay, then. Let’s hear it.
P: Security issues. Guild banks will eliminate the need for account sharing as well as providing detailed logs of item transactions.
A: Blizzard has said that guild permissions means they won’t get involved in guild theft situations. As for account sharing, you shouldn’t have been violating ToS in the first place. Learn to better manage your inventory.
P: Inventory management? Really? Mule characters made inventory management outside of instances irrelevant from day one. And as for what Blizzard has said, they also once said that guild banks would do away with the need for mules as players were already paying for the storage space that mules provided. Let me guess: next comes the slippery slope idea.
A: How is that any different from the belief that Blizzard adding changes for technical and cost reduction purposes somehow justifies guild banks? You just want your QoL conveniences. Admit it.
P: You make it sound like Blizzard hadn’t added any conveniences before guild banks. They increased flight points in Vanilla to make travel easier. He!!, they increased stack sizes to make inventory management easier and that was back during Vanilla so it’s obvious that Blizzard felt there was a need to keep an eye on the inventory management you told me I was doing so poorly. And that’s for one character. Now imagine that on a large scale, like in a guild.
Stay tuned for 5000 more parts.
2 Likes