I Was Wrong

I mean didn’t you see? I’ve already got 4 whole things said about me. 1 claim of racism and 3 bricked keys when all I’ve done is spend (way too much) time arguing here.

Again, nobody “pro” this addon is saying it is perfect and can’t be abused. People are pointing out fair and obvious concerns and we, as a community, should brainstorm ways to improve it and/or hold the devs to task to moderate and actively work to clean up false reports especially in the early days when it is naturally more subject to abuse.

Like I said earlier though…I suspect a lot more people have cause/reason to be against the addon because they know they do engage in things a large portion of the playerbase is likely going to “report” them for rather than people having a super legitimate concern they will somehow be the victim of a guild deciding to just randomly single them out and blacklist them because they missed an interrupt on a +7 rando key.

And short of Blizzard coming up with their own system…don’t be surprised when a void exists and the community looks to fill it.

1 Like

Nah, it’s a pretty what if scenario if you’re falsifying them on purpose. If you want an accurate data set you would have to wait for the addon to actual become used to see if the concerns are valid or not.

people are control freaks these days

1 Like

There will never be accurate data because of falsified reports lol. People said this would happen and it happened within minutes. It’s a problem that you didn’t see this coming.

3 Likes

Don’t bother, he’s just arguing to argue or is part of their moderation team.

3 Likes

There would be, and since you’re doing it to try and attack the addon I can confidently say that the data you’ve provided about false reports on people is biased and invalid.

Pretty typical behavior to be honest, can’t take an opposite opinion :woman_shrugging:

You just didn’t think it through. What did you think was going happen? Are you often surprised when people do things like this?

1 Like

If I’m understanding how the addon works correctly then this is the most amusing part :laughing:

It’s not a community of people all contributing their experience with people to a pool of data all available to everyone which is then automatically parsed by a computer in an unbiased fashion, it is a nerd (or team of nerds) that determines whether (or not) you’re on “the list” :rofl:

5 Likes

They are criticizing an addon. That’s different than attacking. I’d also like my question from earlier answered. :heart:

I’ll give a scenario. I take part in M+15 giveaways in the last 2 weeks I’ve helped 8 people do multiple 15s each for their KSM across my toons depending on the key I or my friends have. What if someone gets pissed that they didn’t win? What’s to stop someone that’s upset from making a false report?

Nothing

Don’t hold your breath. I asked a question several times and they dodge it.

2 Likes

2 Likes

I know. The GD forums are full of people trying to control what others post, trying to erase friendly threads, etc.

3 Likes

Why would they? They fired most the staff. LOL

Not with anything with proper or objective value. It’s all biased data sets that have no objectivity or true constructiveness. Therefore I consider it an attack on the addon rather than a criticism. And I find what if scenario’s annoying because they hold no basis in facts and just speculation. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, the addon barely has any downloads right now. It’s impossible for a proper objective critique to be made when nobody has an idea of how it works in practice.

Sounds like you play with people you already know and it wouldn’t matter if someone reported you because you don’t pug groups if your carrying people in 15s

That’s a fair answer. I think proper data is important, but I also think what if scenarios are allowed. Ya know?

1 Like

Sweetheart, I have like 5 people sending replies it ain’t personal lol you just got ignored because I was responding to someone else at the time.

i know right? such a pain…

1 Like

i agree, blizzard should probably until it hits 2-3 million downloads before they start looking into it at all. humans (and gamers specifically) have always demonstrated that they don’t ever report things falsely for personal reasons, so there’s no reason to suspect that might happen here until we have at least six months of data we can send to an auditing firm to review.