More positive reviews for something means the product that’s been reviewed by tons of reviewers means it’s objectively positive. Same with mixed and negative reviews.
…Kind of like Wrath’s reviews to Shadowlands Reviews.
More positive reviews for something means the product that’s been reviewed by tons of reviewers means it’s objectively positive. Same with mixed and negative reviews.
…Kind of like Wrath’s reviews to Shadowlands Reviews.
Nope. One only needs to look at Reviewer score vs Audience score on Rotten Tomatoes to know that just isn’t true.
Reviews are entirely subjective. There’s no objectivity in it.
Kinda like Classic literally deleting realms because they have too many servers, not enough players.
Positive reviews =/= engaged player base.
The nice Rogue and rest in this thread get infinite while the what ever he is a dk I think gets none
Well you’re free to have your subjective opinion.
You’re talking about one review site. I’m talking about all reviews.
If something reviewed positively, then typically it means it’s good.
Then you don’t know what a Review is then.
A Review isn’t just entirely subjective, they go into what objectively works or doesn’t (like bugs and stuff) as well giving their opinion on it and explain why they have that opinion or what gave them that opinion. It’s not just “i hate this, or i like this”.
That’s irrelevant to the point of you not understanding what reviews are.
…I’m not talking about engagement. I’m talking about reviews.
About the subjective nature of reviews ?
No, that’s an objective fact. Reviews are subjective.
Just because something is a 9/10 doesn’t mean you’ll like it.
Citizen Kane is supposedly the best movie of all time, I had guessed the ending from the first time I saw the sled and found it overall to be a massive bore.
Obviously you don’t know what a review is.
It’s literally a guy giving his opinion.
No, it’s just to prove just because a few game journos gave positive reviews doesn’t mean players will like what they’re selling.
I think that it’s the right way to do a promo that doesn’t involve stuff directly carrying over, like mog/mounts.
They go into the objective things like bugs/glitches, polish, gameplay and so on. There is objectivity to it. Just because you think it’s entirely subjective, doesn’t mean they are completely are.
And again, if you think it’s subjective, why do you care then?
I’ve never said that. That’s something you came up in your head.
You finding it boring doesn’t mean it’s a bad movie objectively speaking.
I play a couple or 2 bad games i find enjoyable like Spyro Enter the Dragonfly, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good game objectively speaking.
It’s almost like i can play games and like them/dislike them, while at the same time recognizing their flaws or pros!
Do i have to keep track of all the “No U” non arguments you make too?..
PBHT-- hahaha…
It’s not just a few game journos mate, it’s also the users that play the game. Ya know, the gamers? The people who play the video games?..
…Where did you even get this idea where if people give it positive reviews, that means players will like it? Who said this other then you?..
Are you desperate and angry at me after that convero, that you’re willing to be a contrarian for the sake of it, despite the reality that you will look wrong?
Not gonna lie, it was entertaining the first time you did it, but now it’s getting sad.
By what objective metric are you judging this ?
What users, they deleted servers my dude.
Are you trying to say the movie is objectively bad? Because if so, you would be objectively wrong.
Infact, it’s actually considered an important film for it’s time and still is.
Again, this is just you diving into your irrelevant “whataboutism” to topicswitch on what i was talking about in that quote you’ve responded. We were talking about reviews, not servers. Stick to the topic and stop acting childish already…
Seems your friend is trolling other topics as well hoping to get yet this is only one I put it in.
Pst! Don’t tell him, but i put Parmesan, caramel drizzle and jalopeno zest on my popping corn!
No, I’m saying it’s subjective.
“Any disagreement is trolling because my world view is that fragile”.
Okay. So you subjectively found it boring. What’s your actual point then?
Nobody said that but you my man, and quite ironic given that you called my status as a gamer out for you missing the main points of mine by your own design.
Honestly glad I have it memorized for when I dip into it to get my mount. Dear god I’d forgotten how absolutely terrible it is with actually TELLING you what you should be looking for… When I was a new player back in 2009 I literally was so lost because of all the building stuff.
No, the hunter said it.
I didn’t see her saying it. Mind quoting where you think she said it?
I quoted it when I replied already.
That’s not her saying that. That’s you just assuming she said that.
Sorry, but your subjective assumption doesn’t count.
This guy and his AD&D is a board game. He’ll keep going too.
Mate, you’re the one who keeps going on. I long past moved on from that while you’re still frothing at the mouth with this… It’s like you can’t learn to let it go and stop being a child… Is that your only thing to retreat to when you’re wrong?..