I was told to just enchant and buy greens off the AH

Do you quit when an obvious premade is the opposition? @120

I am guessing the usually experience is more twinks = a win though?

Not always. Faced this 3 man of twinks in AB which we won. Good groups can overcome a few twinks. Now a 5 man premade of one is a different story

Congratulations, you read one of the descriptions?

Doesnā€™t relate.

You wrote this in response to:

this I was assuming? Now if you meant my BGs, I have always said there will be more in the 19/29/39 bracket, but Iā€™d say far more 19s since technically itā€™s F2P

Sure it happens, but in my experience (and it sounds like your experience too), is that side with more twinks usually wins.

You may feel differently about that than I do, but for me that makes playing low level BGā€™s way less enjoyable when twinks are involved. I feel like I can barely contribute to those games. When someone on my team runs around 1 shooting people, I feel I might as well not even be there. While the other team runs around one shooting me it feels the same.

Low level BGā€™s were better when twinks were separated for me.

The first couple of brackets, meaning 10-19 and 20-29, were absolutely terrible for me due to class. Twinks had nothing to do with it. PvP with no mount is no good for a class with little to no mobility. That will always be a thing, twinks or not.

I agree, my warlock was the most recent toon I levelled.

I did not see any lowbie warlock twinks out there, thatā€™s for sure!

Thereā€™s one in my SSā€™s. 10th one down, a destro lock. Now that Iā€™ve been looking, 19s are really full of twinks on both sides.

I did respond to that, yes. I am also referring to my SSā€™s. In the first game in my album there were 6 twinks.

I donā€™t know whats confusing you here.

1 Like

I was talking about your level 30s bgsā€¦ did you miss that part?

for clarification

I didnā€™t miss it, I just thought it was dishonest to limit it to the 30ā€™s. I should have quoted better and explained that.

Limiting it to the 30ā€™s is just a way to ignore the large amount of twinks in the 20ā€™s. Which might I add, disproves your claim that

Convenient for you to say that, and then immediately move the argument to a specific bracket with incomplete documenting, vs the bracket that has been shown to be infested.

2 Likes

I have said that 19s and 29s do have a good amount of twinks. 2 brackets out of 11 is not good justification to remove a part of the playerbase. And again, itā€™s been said that 19s-39s bracket would be the only ones to get queues.

This is Scharzula. I wanted to join my brethren fellow Worgen so I jumped on mine.
On the topic, twinks are a problem in every level, not just 19, and 29. Last weekend was absolute hell. I have various level toons from teens to 120. I actually had to delete some off this account for allied races. Anyway almost every battleground was a curb stomp.

https://imgur.com/a/lNvC9xD first BG at 70. We started 1 player down, no healer to their 1. No twinks in this one.

Does it matter? One encounter with this twink was enough to bring it to the table. You guys are not asking to fix the root cause. Youā€™re asking to remove a group of players while the problems are still there.

3 Likes

Quing up now for bgā€™s. But new Curse of Oak Island is on tonight so might take a break for a bit.

Okay, I linked my first one.

I still think twinks need a countermeasure. There should be some kind of penalty for exp off. Harsh Item decay would be good with no ability to repair. How can they sit in one spot forever without any sink?