The word “narcissistic” has a lay use which is apart from the formal diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. You can be a narcissist without having NPD. Your continued selfish and disrespectful attempts to use this topic as a shield is wildly, flagrantly offensive.
1 Like
Which is defamatory and insulting. So either youre objectively referencing a condition, or directly insulting, either of which are against tos! Enjoy your vacay!
1 Like
dont need a shield!
It is neither defamatory nor insulting if it is accurate. You insult yourself by behaving in a way that can only be described negatively.
oh i see how it is, so as long as i SAY the person is acting a way, i can use any derogatory language i want? im sure that will go over really well with blizzard.
1 Like
I’m not “saying” anything. I’m describing behavior that is publicly and immediately available for anyone to reference. You’ve put on display myriad anti-social, inflammatory behaviors over the past few days.
you are tho, so this is my last response as youre reported, and ignored, but FYI, theres a report button. If ive acted against TOS, you can feel free to use it. Any sort of name calling towards me or anyone else regardless of anything that was said is against TOS, and is specifically defined by blizzard as harrasment, regardless of whether you determine it to be true or not. Enjoy your Vacation from the forums.
This disingenuous pearl clutching brought to you by the person who said this:
in response to this:
This is ultimately the crux of the issue with bad-faith interlocuters like you: you don’t actually care about anything you say. You don’t have opinions based on evidence and reality so much as you have agendas based on feelings, and you don’t care about the veracity of anything. The only thing that matters to you is that you “win”, and any means is justified to achieve that end.
You don’t care about ableism, but you think it’s a “gotcha!” moment here, and is basically a way you can put a thin veneer over trying to game the forums to silence dissenting parties. You don’t care about insults, obviously. Again, it’s just something you feel you can use to game the system. You might even actually believe that what you did isn’t as bad, even though your comment was specifically intended to provoke and harm and literally none of mine have been, because you didn’t include what you are classifying as “name-calling” in yours. So far as I can tell at least 50% of your posts for a few days now (would shock me if it didn’t go back further but I wasn’t there) have been explicitly and purposefully inflammatory, but wrapped in a package that you think is going to slide under the radar of “the rules”.
Extremely Based
2 Likes
Same exp here - i think it has bugs with role assigning. So far have not had any problems.
1 Like
Another bug it has are some of the lvl ranges, for example, it lets you queu for Old Hillsbrad at 64 but you cant do the RP or even zone in until 66
You still can and should do this even with RDF…The problem is people seem to think grouping ends with RDF, it’s still more efficient to group for RDF queueing. The difficulty of dungeons is also extremely low even for heroics so queueing into a group of randoms is hardly an issue in that area. Not to mention the gearing needs of phase 1 Naxx is extremely relaxed.
The “tedium” for grouping and interacting with people still exists in Wrath even with RDF, simply because dungeons are only 1 very specific reason you interact, group, join guilds and/or add people to your friends list. Again you will still want to do this when queueing RDF.
This LFG system is fine, aside from a few bugs.
1 Like
Well, I’m not entirely “impressed” with it. Yes, I have been able to get groups as of late but I think this is just a short sided success to some. I say that becasue people are leveling and trying to get the best gear they can get prior to wraths launch. And don’t forget, they have raids time gated for a week. So, people trying to rush will be gate keeping players (again) for loot and it’ll be a ripple affect back to what people were already doing in classic and tbcc.
I’m just going to say I remain optimistic to a point. But I will say that I’ve managed to do 4 heroics in one day compared to doing 4 in a span of 4 months. But I highly doubt something like this will continue once wrath hits.
1 Like
Perhaps other people’s definitions of efficiency are different; for example, I think it’s more efficient to be able to quest, farm, and do dailies while a tool looks for a group, or finishes filling the ones with a few of my friends, rather than me/us wasting my/our time looking, and then being able to go back to what we were doing right after.
Oh without a doubt! the most efficiency possible would be to just have a vendor that gives out all of that in dalaran, then you wouldnt even need to do anything.
I’m sure we can both agree that efficiency =/= good. it doesnt mean efficiency is bad either, but we just disagree at what point is too far. You think thats fine! i think its not.
At least not during the period where heroics are a large portion of the available end game. I think these are both very valid opinions to have.
1 Like
If youre ever playing on whitemane, i’ll tank for you dude
Ah, well bringing up an absurd hyperbole that is at the entirely other end of the spectrum from either of you makes sense then, and isn’t at all an argument in bad faith since you minorly reeled back in the next paragraph.
Definitely not when you’re trying to control the play experience (via the removal of iconic and massively beneficial QoL systems of the expansion that is being re-released) of other people while they are not trying to do the same to you.
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.