Well, under the existing HC system it just became even more prestigious.
Perhaps. But, when people say the gear doesn’t matter, you out level it fast anyways. Then what do they care if people farm gear that’s going to be out leveled soon anyways?
the game is not meant to be played like that.
No. Once per day solves a lot of problems in exchange for small inconvenience. I think it’s a very good thing–nothing would suck more than seeing people spam chat selling “runs.”
4 Likes
Aw come on.
People choose their way and to them it’s how it’s meant to be played.
I think that way - dungeon logging - is sad and unfun but it’s not for me.
he’s not choosing his way. he’s asking the company making the game to change the game for him.
i wouldn’t have a problem if he chose his way.
but he’s choosing my way too.
2 Likes
And how would it change how you play? You could still play 1 dungeon per day. It would give more options, not take away
right? but he cant play unless his has his stupid barb. it’s a no-go deadzone. can’t be done. no barb no game.
but i can choose to paly suboptimally, no problem.
1 Like
Changing the game wouldn’t affect people because we can choose to not dungeon spam.
Blizz elected to not allow it. I’m fine with that.
He can ask for a change - doesn’t everyone?
Don’t think it will happen so he can continue to choose to be a sad boy and dungeon log if he wishes.
The reason to limit the instance use was because its an easy code change that limits EXP exploitation and boosting on HC realms.
The Classic team is really small, so keeping the changes to how the game works is for the best if we want a good experience.
2 Likes
Cry more 
you demanding to do DM over and over until you get a blue sword is not my problem.
The developers explain their rationale why they capped the dungeon at 1/day. It’s not a technical limitation. It’s a design choice in order to create a fun experience for hardcore. Spamming dungeons led to a boring experience for hardcore players so they put the limit on it.
On this website in the News section, they have the Wowcast Developer Chat and go into detail why they did this and other design choices for hardcore. I can’t link it because links aren’t allowed.
Then why not put that personal limitation on themselves, if it’s not fun? It seems to me that people who would spam dungeons aren’t playing for fun, and rather hardcore isn’t for them. See what I did there?
I mean 1 dungeon was a pretty hard limit, even 3 would have been small but at least you could hunt some gear while leveling.
Having 18/20 deviate hides and full clearing again just to earn the 2, or abandoning quest is just an annoying decision to have to make.
1 Like
Correct and I don’t disagree, but there is also the fact that they can simply dial that into play for HC without any real coding; its just a database change.
The system the OP wants where they turn off XP after 1 run while darn simple is not as mindless to change as just setting instance lock out timers differently (an existing system)
No, if I’m going to do content I want xp. I’m not wasting my time for items that may not drop, I want levels. This is a different mode. Play it or don’t.
No changes!
That’s the point of what I suggested. It’s to keep the open world “alive” and out of the dungeons. But, it also allows people to get gear, or as Cita said:
You are allowed to trade and use the AH. You can get sufficient leveling gear already. The game is not so difficult that players need blues to level. Are you having issues leveling in greens?
You can get your Deviate hides in your run the next day, or you can group up and farm them in the cave just outside. This isn’t impossible since official allows you to group freely.
Nobody wants a bunch of lvl 19 twinks running around.
Speak for yourself. Level 19 Mak’gora twinks are an eventuality, and the stakes will be higher than 19 twinks smashing the 10-19 WSG bracket.
I been leveling in greys till a few levels ago, with just a couple greens. I 100% don’t need the blues. But, it’s fun to obtain them. You don’t have to gatekeep, but here you are.