railing on as you are is childish.
Join the exchange or go away.
1 Like
This is also incorrect, once it is filed with the clerk it gets the case number and is de facto filed with the court. That is why there is a court case number on the filing document that everyone has read.
Yes they can. Literally everyone is telling you that your wrong. But your years of watching “Law & Order” make you an expert. I hope you never have to serve on Juty, people like you are why people get wrongly convicted. You dont care about facts, you dont care about real evidence, you dont understand the process. Why you fail to grasp this? Either your trolling, or you are so “woke” that facts escape you and you base everything on how you feel and no one will ever change that.
2 Likes
And it is either processed as “denied” or “filed” with the court for docket assigning.
The obstacle in this debate is where you are assigning “filed”.
So, then, you are “woke”. Ironic…
1 Like
Blizzard are the Clintons of the gaming industry. Spends all this time virtue signaling then goes and fondles women. Modern Degen Democrats.
1 Like
By your accounts “everyone” is three people. I will promise not to serve in any legal capacity if you promise not to serve in any accounting or polling capacity.
We will have to agree to disagree folks.
1 Like
It hasn’t been through the docket process yet as there is no judge assigned…
lmao…you actually think the filing we’ve all seen with NUMEROUS victims stories was literally made without ANY evidence, ANY corroboration, ANY testimony, etc ?
uh huh…
4-6 month new hire vs people who have been working at blizz for years. These are not on the same lvl and therefore not the “other side”
I’m sorry your education system failed you so much as to understand the difference between a he said she said arguement and a state investigation with a ton of blizzard staff in support of the women and walks out vs corporate shills who are only in it for the buck.
Sure someone who worked for the bush administration really knows what’s up and is trustworthy of an opinion.
Grow up
And by the by, it is entirely possible that my understanding is wrong. I do appreciate that you and I at least were able to discuss it without sinking to personal level attacks to bolster our points.
3 Likes
well thank you for that mental image. Now that’ll be stuck in my head all day 
1 Like
Regardless of any conversation points, all of this conversation and not one single time did you get aggressive or call names or anything. I think that warrants pointing out and even if we don’t agree, I enjoyed the well thought out back and forth. Wish you well and thank you for the engagement.
3 Likes
They only deny it if there is something wrong with the filing, a technicality that they are usually allowed to fix.
There is going to be a judge assigned to all of this because there has to be. There has to be someone to rule on things throughout the procedure.
The affidavits and so on dont mean a whole lot at this point. What does matter is the right forms and so on being used. If that checks out, Blizzard gets served, they have to answer, there can be extension requests, discovery is going to take forever because Blizzard can call upon anyone every single person that wrote an affidavit for a deposition and the other way is true to. This isnt going to be a 2 month thing and it will be done. This will probably spand years.
The things that will be asked Blizzard is things like why wasnt Ms. Smith paid as much as Mr. Case? And Blizzard would have to give a reason.
1 Like
I just received my woke achievement on the WoW forums, this is a badge of honor although it conflicts with the multitude of other achievements I have previously made on the Internet. This conflict of labels is concerning, but I suppose expected.
Fellow “woke” people, what achievements have you unlocked on the web?
3 Likes
Axiom, but yeah.
That’s just … not correct, but let me not start there; I’ll get to it. Let’s start with:
The number of unsuccessful lawsuits filed sits at zero?
Or, allow me to amend that, the number of lawsuits that have two years’ preparation put into them, which are subsequently unsuccessful in a court of law stands at zero?
I am just trying to understand how two years’ prep has anything to do with determining fact. A filed lawsuit is not taken as fact, by anyone. A lawsuit that has been prepped for two years can certainly fail. It can be thrown out. These things have happened.
As long as you are avoiding filing a frivolous suit, anyone can file anything if they feel they’ve done enough prep to have a case. The strength of your filing is what the court process determines.
To file a lawsuit, you literally just bring it down to the courthouse, pay your fee, it gets stamped… that’s it. The clerk will review the documents to make sure they are in order (proper format, signatures, dates, what have you) but makes absolutely, positively no determination about the factual content of the suit.
They’re a law clerk, for pete’s sake. A city clerk. Not a judge or jury.
I could do it today if I wanted to and had a reason to do so. Filing is nothing but a process open to anyone. Would there be repercussions if it were a frivolous suit? Sure! But that wouldn’t prevent me from filing a lawsuit built from a cookbook, if I wanted to… though I would certainly spend a short time in jail for filing a frivolous suit, and depending on how cheeky I was trying to be, contempt of court.
So, for the record (https://www.courts.ca.gov/9616.htm)
In order to file a lawsuit in California:
- You must be a person of legal entity (nutshell: connected to the case)
- You must have legal capacity (nutshell: Be an adult)
Eh… that’s it and that’s all. You don’t need to “pre-determine” that the statements in your lawsuit are proven fact. That’s nearly oxymoronic as the court process is what determines fact and guilt.
It does not require anything other then “this is my claim.” To file lawsuit against someone… what is so difficult to understand?
And for the record I am not saying nothing happened, but I also am not condemning the company when zero evidence other then he said she said has come out.
2 Likes
True, just like all those bogus Trump election lawsuits that were thrown out with reprimand. Can’t have a trial if you have zero evidence.
AND in order to get thrown out they have to go in front of a judge. One has not even been assigned to the case… which means???