I love showing my hunter tho i usually use my shaman cause at times i feel embarrassed to be hunter. So many bad changes happened through years, lone wolf caused mm to lose pets cause why take a dps loss, rsv, bm idk, i mean bestial wrath always been there but it just doesnt feel like when i enjoyed it more. Every mmo i played pet archer class, wow has been hardest lately. I personally be happy enough to have rsv back thats all i want, despite other stuff.
Iâm going to assume the irony of someone who posts on a 120 Warrior telling someone else that, posting on a 110 Hunter in the Hunter forums is ironic, is lost on you. Since he probably quit because of the RSV changes - like thousands of other hunters - it is reasonable to assume that it would carry more weight than posting on a 120 hunter ⌠or a Monk ⌠or a Warrior.
Youâre only here because you like to rub salt in the wounds. Iâm grateful I donât have to live in your head.
Doesnât really work, since Iâve never asked for proof from someone in order for them to express their opinions on a forum. In short, youâre correlation is stupid at best, and completely wrong.
p.s. it takes a special level of idiocy to think people should switch forum avatars every time they post in a different class forum.
i donât care what class people post on. gnomes on the other hand are unforgivable.
False. We all post on our Hunters, which is all that is needed to gleam that we play Hunters. Playing a Hunter is a necessary component of being involved in providing meaningful feedback and engaging in meaningful discussion about the Hunter class. If you donât play a Hunter, then why should you get to decide what is good or bad about playing a Hunter? Why should you get to tell people who do play Hunters that their opinions about Hunter are wrong?
Nobody is expecting you to do that. We just want you to prove you actually play a Hunter once. Doesnât mean you have to switch back and forth to them constantly. This is a perfectly reasonable expectation.
I mean, he doesnât even have to switch. He could just post a link to his hunter, but he wonât even do that.
No, I wonât post a link to my hunter because some cry babies need validation. Bepples is about the only one who frequents these posts with more experience than me. I donât need to prove anything to forum whiners, especially when their âfeedbackâ is nothing more than whining about wanting a 4th spec.
p.s. itâs also stupid that after 15 years youâre surprised that a good number of people have a lot of the classes at or near max. Itâs also ironic and telling how you donât ask the people who agree with you to prove who they are when posting on low levels or alts. Hypocrite much?
especially when their âfeedbackâ is nothing more than whining about wanting a 4th spec.
Says the guy who does nothing but complain about other people on the forums and attack people with ad hominin attacks, while boasting about their experience but refusing to validate that experience.
Itâs also ironic and telling how you donât ask the people who agree with you to prove who they are when posting on low levels or alts.
No, no itâs not ironic. They arenât claiming to have tons more experience playing hunters, or implying their opinion is more valuable then anyone elseâs because theyâre a âmythic raiderâ and anyone who isnât doesnât have value in their opinion.
You want to talk about being hypocritical? You decry the raid experience of other people while refusing to even prove youâve raided on a hunter.
No, I wonât post a link to my hunter because some cry babies need validation. Bepples is about the only one who frequents these posts with more experience than me. I donât need to prove anything to forum whiners, especially when their âfeedbackâ is nothing more than whining about wanting a 4th spec.
Then you are lying and donât play a Hunter, period. If you cannot demonstrate that you do, or even attempt to demonstrate it, then you donât play one.
But letâs compare the difference between the feedback I provide, and the feedback you provide.
My feedback:
Many Hunter players are in agreement that the state of the Hunter class is not very good, so just as I did with my thread specifically about a ranged Survival spec, I will make this thread with the intention of detailing the Hunter class as a whole; possible changes that could be made to the general class, specs and pets, in order to make the Hunter class more engaging and to better fulfill its class fantasy. I will include four specs in this post; Beast Mastery, Marksmanship, Ranged Survival (SâŚ
Your feedback:
Hunter isnât getting a 4th spec, no matter how much you cry about it.
Hunter is not getting a 4th spec, no matter how many new threads you start.
The only one here whining about a 4th spec is you. Literally all you do is say a fourth spec will never happen and deride anyone who requests it or provides feedback as to how it could be done.
Luckily for the rest of the world you donât get to determine who is or who is not lying. For someone who claims to use logic, everything you say is mostly devoid of it. You are not an authority figure in any way, shape, or form⌠and you donât get to dictate anyone do anything because you want them to.
p.s. I just checked Shadowlands alpha, and SV is still melee and no ranged option. Have a wonderful day!
Many Hunter players are in agreement that the state of the Hunter class is not very good
p.p.s.
By the way, using your own logic, nothing you say about hunter is relevant in any fashion. You havenât played a retail hunter in years, and therefore donât know what the heck youâre talking about.
Luckily for the rest of the world you donât get to determine who is or who is not lying. For someone who claims to use logic, everything you say is mostly devoid of it.
It this somehow a mystery to you? If you claim to play a Hunter, yet refuse to demonstrate it when doing so would be incredibly easy, then the most probable conclusion is that you are lying. That is the logical conclusion.
By the way, using your own logic, nothing you say about hunter is relevant in any fashion. You havenât played a retail hunter in years, and therefore donât know what the heck youâre talking about.
Do you not understand the difference between playing Hunter for 7+ years and playing Hunter for 0 years?
Iâve played hunter for 15 years⌠Just because you cry like a 5 year old because you want âproofâ is irrelevant. Do you not understand the difference?
Wanting proof for claims is not something only 5 year olds do. In fact, Iâd say that it is something practiced by the intelligent lot of our species. One thing 5 year olds do though, is that they make claims and then refuse to back them up because their claim was a lie.
i donât care what class people post on. gnomes on the other hand are unforgivable.
Iâll take a gnome over a vulp.
p.s. itâs also stupid that after 15 years youâre surprised that a good number of people have a lot of the classes at or near max. Itâs also ironic and telling how you donât ask the people who agree with you to prove who they are when posting on low levels or alts. Hypocrite much?
+1
It is the classic move of wow forums: I have no argument or any valid points to add, so Iâll say youâre wrong cause you ainât posting on X class.
It is the classic move of wow forums: I have no argument or any valid points to add, so Iâll say youâre wrong cause you ainât posting on X class.
Youâve been exposed to the numerous valid arguments. You just ignore them.
Furthermore, the invalid argument is the one arguing that Hunters shouldnât be allowed to receive universally positive changes, especially when you donât even play a Hunter yourself. Why should a person who doesnât play a Hunter be entitled to telling Hunter players, on the Hunter forums, to shut up and to stop asking for these universally positive changes?
Itâs absolutely vapid to think something wouldnât suffer as a result of Blizzard adding a 4th hunter spec. They canât balance 3, but you think adding a 4th spec is universally positive⌠There are finite resources, this wouldnât be done in a vacuum.
For the sake of argument, letâs pretend they added a 4th spec. It would take about a day before you would be back on the forums whining that âxâ isnât playing the same, or âYâ doesnât function the same.
Nope, no 4th spec.
Anyone saying 4th specs makes everyone happy always only see the small pictures on things⌠or simply dont care about the health of the game⌠its all about themselves only.
and then we have the troll dwarf hunter⌠trolling a game he doesnt play, calling others names, assuming others knows nothing be he knows everything based on a what⌠60x60 pixel art and colored text under forum name?
Yes it will hurt the hunters that dont adapt, yes it will require healers to adapt (some already did).
You told me in the other thread that complaints about the Revive Pet change were invalid, because there are no Arenas on alpha yet.
How have healers already adapted to keeping a pet alive in Arenas when there are no Arenas to keep a pet alive in?
You are merely trying to create a problem with no problem now.
They canât balance 3, but you think adding a 4th spec is universally positiveâŚ
They literally added three new specs to the game in Legion when SV was changed to melee. So this argument is dead on arrival.
Demonstrate how 36 specs is the magic number where Blizzard can balance them, and then demonstrate how 37 specs would be 1 too many and would completely upend all of Blizzardâs resources. If you cannot demonstrate this, or argue how it would be true, then your point is moot.
Anyone saying 4th specs makes everyone happy always only see the small pictures on things⌠or simply dont care about the health of the game⌠its all about themselves only.
Demonstrate how it would harm the game as a whole. Provide reasoning or logic to back up your claims. If you canât do that, then your argument can be written off.