I choose to treat them as entertainment and then seek out the actual valuable advice about the game on third party sites. You do you though.
I’m not the one asking for them to be changed to suit my desires. Maybe don’t go to the forums if the reality of what they are is so displeasing?
Bro, all that happened was you brought up the first amendment and someone said “that doesn’t apply here”.
For whatever reason, you’ve spiraled since then. Nobody understands it lol
Is that implying that I am? I must’ve missed an entire conversation we’ve had together in your head!
Did you miss the part where I also said it didn’t apply? And that I said it was my mistake?
And nobody is spiraling. I’m just fine lol.
I’m just peeved people are siding with an obvious troll, lol. They didn’t come add anything to the conversation, other than to rag on the speech thing.
And insult, ofc.
It’s been derailed, this thread.
They literally only said “the first amendment doesn’t apply here.”, and when someone else said “no one brought it up”, they said “you must lack reading comprehension because someone did bring it up”.
That was enough for you to accuse them of trolling.
Like. This genuinely makes zero sense lmao.
I mean ima head out. This is beyond bewildering. Best of luck to you I guess 
Obvious trolls will often side with obvious trolls.
The forums would be extremely boring if not for all the bad takes. Dumb takes is part of the fun of reading yahoo comments.
You’re stuck in a loop, like she was.
Just ignore this guy. I did, much better forum experience now.
The…irony…
It’s been fun
You’re arguing with someone that told me that incendiary comments were “self-evident” then insisted that nobody would know what they considered incendiary.
Whatever argument works the best against the reply in question they will use. Whether it contradicts everything else they’ve said or not.
“mUh coNtExT”
Battle.net account posting can’t come soon enough.
Y’all could be one person for all I know. I can’t prove it.
Good luck, sorry if I trolled, not my intent at all.
Yeah, that’s blatantly false. If I wasn’t confident you were trolling before, willfully misrepresenting a dialogue certainly confirms it now! All the best!
“mUh coNtExT” incoming.
so, my response to you was “you’re incapable of reading in context”, and then you proceed to isolate my quotes without including the person to whom I’m replying.
I mean, chef’s kiss. Comedy really writes itself. Thanks, bud
Also, none of that is contradictory. Just thought I’d add that in there
Called it.
The context is that one contradicting statement suited one reply and another suited a separate reply.
Well, if I make a self-defeating argument, and predict what the other person will say because they’re correct and I’m not, I’m not all of a sudden right because I could predict what they were going to say.
The fact you think it does says quite a bit, and what started out is funny is quickly becoming sad
I mean, yes, it’s pretty sad to watch people misrepresent their genuine offense as a joke, backpedal on that, then contradict themselves from reply to reply.
This is what it looks like:
This dude was making fun of people’s grammar, and writing style. That is all you need to know about this person.
lol, I’ll leave you to your delusions. Hope it gets better for ya 