Give it an Expac. Im sure the New flying will be bridged out of just Dragons.
2 Likes
I mean I’d definitely have preferred player housing as opposed to what ever the fly mini game is now so I guess I’d trade that out
2 Likes
No Country for Old Men.
3 Likes
This and this… while I’m not truely opposed to tinker’s eventually I think what they’ve shown and what we have seen in the alpha is a great solid foundation moving forward for WoW.
Could just be me, I think Evokers are fun, and glad they exploring more “bestial races” aswell, fingers crossed later in the expansion Tuskarrs also become playable.
You play a Paladin. Like the Paladin Hero from WC3.
My Guildmate like to play Shaman. Like the Farseer Hero unit in WC3.
I Personally Play a monk, Like the Pandaren Monk Hero in WC3.
So… What If I want to play a Tinker, Like the Tinker hero in WC3? Oh right. You can’t.
Hopefully that helps you understand, It’s like you’re one card short of a full deck.
2 Likes
You’re not alone there. While I am a fan of the talent change, the state of BFA into SL has left me disillusioned. I am going to wait for the reviews on DF to come out before I consider buying it.
What if I wanna play the Pit Lord from WC3? Oh wait-- We killed them all I think >.>
1 Like
The Pit Lord’s abilties are Iconic!
Luckily They’re represented by our classes!
Doom, Rain of Fire, Howl of Terror?
That’s all on Warlock.
But Tinker’s Notable Abilities, Cluster Missiles, Turrets (Pocket Factories), and Mech Suits? We don’t have a class that does that. >.>
2 Likes
2004 to 2022= 20 years?
I’m not great at math, but maybe I’m not as bad at it as you are 
I could get behind all of those + the talent trees we’re getting (once they’re worked out and finalized after feedback) to be honest…
There is nothing I want less in life than Tinkers as a playable class in WoW
1 Like
Evokers have Cemented for me that literally anything can happen.
Tinkers are coming, I’m sure.
They’d be easy to impliment, based on the RTS, and satisfy plenty of players.
(easier than Evokers, that’s for sure.)
3 Likes
As much as I’m all for Tinkers.
That is a terrible trade.
lmao.
Also Archaeology, seriously?
18 is definitely the “better part of” 20. You may not be great at math, but you’re even worse at reading comprehension.
(Sorry, but if you’re going to be insanely rude to someone while exposing your ignorance in the process, you deserve what’s coming to you.)
3 Likes
Relax, white knight. I didn’t claim to have been playing the game for 20 years.
If your post is the measure of what’s coming to me, white knight; then the sting of karma was never so painless.
You are mistaken. I am a Death Knight.
Neither did the OP.
Good. I wasn’t trying to hurt your feelings, just point out that you were being rude based on a misunderstanding.
I didn’t misunderstand anything, and your interpretation of the post is your own issue. After making a fairly low quality post, the OP claimed to have been playing for 20 years.
I felt compelled to post. Your white knighting is appreciated I’m sure. Thanks for your interjection and your contribution, which wasn’t much really.
It’s still going to be a better premise than the after life
1 Like
The “better part of” is a common phrase that means “close to but not quite” or “almost.” And yet here you are insulting other people’s intelligence based on your own ignorance of the English language. Fascinating.
You’re welcome, and right back atcha 
3 Likes
Chef’s Kiss
Well played.
3 Likes
I would give up all my gold to have more gold
1 Like