High Elf POSITIVITY Thread 😎

[Cassima-greymane (Cassima)]

Getting your troops to the battlefield when they’re needed there? Yeah, that kind of is very important.

[Saraslam-frostmourne]

If you don’t want public disagreement. Stick to a discord. Otherwise, deal with people disagreeing with you. .

There is a huge difference between a disagreement and being toxic!

[Itoldyouso-illidan]

Give me a good reason, I’ve an open mind.

There is a huge difference between a disagreement and being toxic!

Yeah, being toxic involves telling people to leave your discussion for disagreeing.

[Saraslam-frostmourne]

Yeah, being toxic involves telling people to leave your discussion for disagreeing.

What are you? 12 years old? Seriously Broflake, grow up. <— There you go, that is a bit of toxicity, not a disagreement.

You should look at your own behaviour and see the difference between what is a disagreement and what is toxic behaviour.

[Avarie-farstriders]

I’ll give you a hug!

[Lannisteros-proudmoore]

https://media.giphy.com/media/1powin3MU7Ap3pyv4s/giphy.gif

OOF! Those two are not my particular cups of tea but I would be ecstatic for the people I know who want them!! I JUST CANT GET OVER HOW REALISTIC THE PAGE IS, like it looks like a real page for an allied race love it!!

[Itoldyouso-illidan]

What are you? 12 years old? Seriously Broflake, grow up.

I think its pretty childish to begin insulting people for pointing out your behavior, don’t you?

You should look at your own behaviour and see the difference between what is a disagreement and what is toxic behaviour.

I mean, telling you “respect other’s disagreeing with you” doesn’t appear to be toxic.
Calling someone a 12 year old and telling you grow up? Definitely some toxicity

[Itoldyouso-illidan]

Hugging is not acceptable in this environment maam.

[Saraslam-frostmourne]

I mean, telling you “respect other’s disagreeing with you” doesn’t appear to be toxic.
Calling someone a 12 year old and telling you grow up? Definitely some toxicity

Yeah, obviously you like to misquote on the part where I put it as it is a bit of toxicity and not a disagreement. Here, let me quote the entire line for you:

What are you? 12 years old? Seriously Broflake, grow up. <— There you go, that is a bit of toxicity, not a disagreement.

You see it?

[Dorp-emerald-dream]

I understand your view on the matter, but you need to consider that both blood elves and high elves are the same race design wise. So while they are different in terms of lore, from a game design perspective, they are defined as being the same. This overarching design perspective takes precedence over the lore.

Great,
This has nothing to do with the high elves (that aren’t blood elves!) being requested though.

If you have a problem with high elves (that aren’t blood elves) being alliance, perhaps you should kindly ask the writers to remove them from the alliance?

The theme of the race being playable, you roll Horde. So no, unfortunately, its not a perfectly suitable AR option. Let alone AR"s aren’t even some new fangled thing.
They are literally a race option behind a rep grind. Nothing special.

Except the alliance affiliated high elves (that aren’t blood elves, and still identify as high elves) are alliance. So no.

Firstly, no, they would not be unique as they are the same race as blood elves. You’re not adding anything new to the game. It doesn’t add in any healthy way to the game’s design

They are an opposition to blood elves. The DI dwarves were not new when they were added as they have been alliance since cata, high elves being alliance even longer.
The high elves have received heaps more lore than DI dwarves before they were added.
And new lore is being discussed here.
You don’t know what’s healthy, like I said, stop acting like you’re entitled to what people desire.

Yep. It is a Horde race first, and that sets precedence for the design. Otherwise, by your logic, we might a well make humans playable on the Horde. It is not a healthy way to design the game if any different lore group made for story, is used to justify playability.

The high elves (that identify as high elves) being alliance makes them alliance.
Again, you don’t have a clue what’s healthy. And a person playing a race has no effect on the games “health”.

Nope.
I am perfectly entitled to oppose you on the matter.

You are, but you’re acting entitled to what people want, as if your view is superior and absolute baed on zilch. You’re not a GM lol.
You don’t get to dictate what people want based on your pretentious standards or “health” shenanigans. It’s ridiculous, doubly since playable race has no effect on your gameplay.

[Itoldyouso-illidan]

Yeah, obviously you like to misquote

I didn’t misquote you, I quoted you before you edited your post. Good try though

[Tarrok-thorium-brotherhood (Tarrok)]

I think in these days we have to limit it to standing 6 feet apart with our arms spread

[Drede-cairne (Drede)]

Here’s some art by Ercarp.

https://imgur.com/a/QqsR8Hj

There is a link to their tumblr at the bottom.

And here’s the original link to the High Elf/San’layn art if you want to give them a like.

Hipnos

[Saraslam-frostmourne]

Great,
This has nothing to do with the high elves (that aren’t blood elves!) being requested though.

Remember when Blizzard also said that we’re not playing a race as a whole, but only a faction out of that race?

[Avarie-farstriders]

I’ll wear a mask.

[Itoldyouso-illidan]

Great,
This has nothing to do with the high elves (that aren’t blood elves!) being requested though.

If you have a problem with high elves (that aren’t blood elves) being alliance, perhaps you should kindly ask the writers to remove them from the alliance?

It absolutely has everything to do with your request Dorp. You cannot dismiss game design for the sake of what you want.

Except the alliance affiliated high elves (that aren’t blood elves, and still identify as high elves) are alliance. So no.

Again, the race itself is playable from a game design view. All you are doing right now is trying to ignore my point while demanding your point be the only valid one. That isn’t how a discussion works. I have addressed your point. If you refuse to address mine, then maybe you should cede yours and admit it is flawed.

The DI dwarves were not new when they were added as they have been alliance since cata, high elves being alliance even longer.

The DI dwarves are simply dwarves. Hence, they stayed on the Alliance and did not move Horde.

You don’t know what’s healthy, like I said, stop acting like you’re entitled to what people desire.

I have a pretty good understanding given my knowledge and experience. Sorry, you are not entitled to what the Horde has based on lore alone. Game design takes precedence.

Again, you don’t have a clue what’s healthy.

But you do?
Your entire argument is breaking down to “No one’s view is valid except for those who agree with me.”.
That isn’t going to gain you any headway in getting what you want.

You are, but you’re acting entitled to what people want

I am not the one making a request of a Horde race.

as if your view is superior and absolute baed on zilch.

This is largely speaking about yourself. I am stating my view is equal to yours. Simple.

You’re not a GM lol.

Neither are you lol. So maybe not spend your time declaring people’s views invalid on the basis of opposing yours?

It’s ridiculous, doubly since playable race has no effect on your gameplay.

It certainly does. It breaks down the unique faction difference. WHy play a game based around factions if the races are shared? Might as well dissolve them entirely.

[Itoldyouso-illidan]

I request you wear a hazmat suit.

[Avarie-farstriders]

I’m not that kind of elf.

[Itoldyouso-illidan]

Burning down the tree released many toxins, you are now.

[Starlagosa-dentarg (Starlagosa)]

Give in to the high elf love, you can do it!

Some of us already love the Blood/High Elves that we have playable already, tyvm.