You’re being very combative in nature, I asked you a question. Does this mean you’re acknowledging your actions and that they detract from the argument? It’s not hard to give a yes or no.
I get you are displeased with the opposition you have encountered, but this combative tone doesn’t serve to assist your argument.
It just comes across as the ProHelf group falling to pieces because this combative tone and action has happened with five posters now.
We got a couple. Its sort of a slippery slope. Depending on your point of view.
Some kultirans let us use there dock and they are friendly.
We got leper gnome servants serving the forsaken.
Night elf forsaken dark rangers and probably some captured civilians that may switch sides.
Gazlowe getting along with the mechagnome prince ; p
Then you can maybe see void elves that didnt switch sides and respected the exile but no proof so far of that.
Id say night elves or humans are our best bet unless we get some lore.
Honestly, I wish we could play as neutral factions sometimes. I have druids and shammys who would prefer to focus on cleansing things and studying the elements etc, instead of getting caught up in pointless conflicts over and over.
1 Like
With how they did pandaren dirty, id expect a neutral faction to not receive good writing ever
You admitted to purposely being combative/antagonistic. No one has to give respect to anyone that acts like that.
That the AntiHelf side continues to come in and be antagonistic doesn’t mean that the ProHelf side has to put up with it.
Also, in case you didn’t know, we are only responsible for our own actions. Even Lore stated himself and players tend to do a lot of “speaking for others” when realistically you can only speak for yourself.
This happens on both sides, so trying to point out only one end doesn’t do anything but show bias.
4 Likes
Isnt that kind of the point?
None of these are on the level of High Elves though, which is the crucial difference.
You don’t go around seeing anyone talk about how faithful Jinyu are to the Alliance for instance, because their contained in one moment.
High Elves aren’t. They’re the only Alliance NPC race that moves through multiple expansions aiding the Alliance and still aren’t playable.
Horde has no equivalent to the High Elves in this regard.
3 Likes
What point?
1 Like
The point of the whole anti and pro parties. One side stands firm and one side attacks
Given what the horde did to the pandaren I have no idea why any would choose the horde honestly. In the horde start area, pandas are helping out at an alliance fort, but it’s all adult pandas and no one appears to be guarding them.
Alliance side, you go to the horde outpost, and they have ONLY children, being guarded by demonic eyes doing forced labor.
1 Like
Because Ji > Aysa
Could be “Fogtide Humans” as an Horde Allied Race, Humans with piratey customization. Sounds good to me.
There are some in Silvermoon too, but they aren’t doing it willfully. I don’t know how many people would play a Leper Gnome, probably more than the people that will play Mechagnomes. Can be an Allied Race, all it needs is Blizzard wanting to do it actually.
I don’t know if any Night Elf civilian would side with their killers, but those Dark Rangers did and i can’t negate that. But many don’t like the Night Elf Forsaken concept as an Allied Race, and honestly i see a lot of Horde players against it.
It all falls down to Blizzard wanting to do something, no argument against can change this.
1 Like
Elune has forsaken them, didnt you hear Sira?
Ji is pretty awesome. I think those two crazy kids should work out their differences though.
1 Like
I mean they are married, i believe
Are they? Family time must be awkward.
“How was work today dear?”
“Oh it was fine, I just killed a bunch of your horde friends.”
1 Like
That would require her to get off the boat, she has alleria syndrome.
Unless it happened in some novel, no, they’re not.
1 Like
My mistake then, i must have thought it was implied in War Crimes…but hey them receiving no writing is about the norm
Giant strawman.
Can you go back and read the preceding statements I made directly without editing it mentally?
As far as I have seen, the proHelf side continously and repeatedly acts antagonistic. When they, such as yourself, are called out on it, you go into aggressive denial tactics and become combative. Even worse, you then project it onto others. When an example is given to you to demonstrate what you are doing, you misconstrue it as the opposing side being combative.
So?
Just because someone does something means that you need to therefore do the same. On top of this, an accusation of bias does not fly since I have called both sides out on the behavior. You should stop making assumptions when you’ve little ground to make them.
You should stop painting people in a way to justify your feelings of them, because it is unhealthy and just creates a whole “Us vs them.”.
I may dislike the way Wanobi speaks, but I do not paint him as antagonistic. I only speak on the behaviors I observe and nothing more.
It is why I address only the argument provided by the person and do not make comments of “WELL THE PRO ELF SIDE SAYS!”.
I don’t care. I address what is from that particular person and only speak of “sides” when it isbeing addressed by the other individual.
Now we can go around in circles all day where you accuse me of a bunch of things and I shoot them down, and you bring up more things for me to shoot down. Or, you can stick to the arguments at hand instead of arguing about the people behind them.
If you cannot decide what to do its fine, Ill wait for you to make an argument regarding this discussion before addressing you.