Here's an idea, give warriors lust

[Syegfryed-tol-barad (Syegfryed)]

@Altani-mannoroth

Yet, that hasn’t ever been how it plays or even has been explained to be intended to play.

And that is the problem, it should play more like blademaster.

@Altani-mannoroth

Nor, outside a particular cloth-armored high-Agility unit, has going into Looney Tunes Tasmanian Devil spins been associated with any mastery of swordplay.

Blademasters are plate-users and in wow they use strength

@Altani-mannoroth

Why would someone dependent on actual mastery of their weapon fall back to just spinning in circles more so than an enraged zugzug Fury?

Because the animation is just animation, the idea is unleashing a tornado os precise and powerful strikes to everyone in your range.

The problem, is a inherently problem with warrior, is how they still use basic vanilla and warcraft 3 animation, Look at Samuro from ehartstone, their bladestorm is exactly what ours should look like:

https://youtu.be/B6xoRBkoZWQ?t=105

@Altani-mannoroth

I’d love an actual “Blademaster” (or, Weaponmaster) focused Arms design —don’t get me wrong— but… unless by “Blademaster” you mean an illusion- and stealth-magic–using orc in a toga a la Warcraft III, there’s no more sense in making the spin-to-win of Bladestorm unique to Arms than to make Sudden Death’s opportunism unique to Fury.

Again, you are focusing too much on the dumb and archaic animation, look at the video and you will change minds.

We don’t rly need a 100% copy from wc3, windwalk and mirror image can be tailored into Slayer easily without breaking the game.

@Altani-mannoroth

This, though, would apply about equally to any combination of Warrior.

I mean, that your fault for asking just one phrase and 5 adjectives, can’t rly complain if the answer is not to your liking

Beside,s Fury doesn’t play like that, fury is more of the barbarian, delivering more blows instead of letal ones.

And Prot is nothing like that.