You’re asking a lot from a community that after 15 years still thinks adding a synonym for rectal to in game items, spells, or talents counts as humour.
Who would you have as the Arbiter?
Jailer 2.0 or generic Arbiter 2.0 like the vessel is supposed to be in the first place? Even the old Arbiter is just dormant and not even dead lol.
Even if you want to cherry-pick my post to protect your inner ideals, doesn’t change the rest of the post, the threads in this forum and the general feeling of the community.
It is an apathetic NPC. Like I said before. They could just have used Flynn or Shaw.
It’s clear you’ve got an agenda or maybe you’re just jealous? I don’t know.
There are many reasons why Pelagos makes sense. Just because you aren’t willing to see it is a you problem.
Oh. WoW. Just. Woah.
Now with this really deep input, it is really justified that the worst character of the entire franchise should become its expansion’s protagonist
That’s how we know you rushed through the kyrian campaign
Plus your political views shows us you’re not really complaining about pelagos
He’s actually a great character mon. He be compassionate and be believin in what da shadowlands stands for. He be non judgemental and want ta help others. He is a better fit den anybody else imo.
He be remindin me of Anduin actually. People seem to dislike him too for not being a huge hairy jerk wad racist power hungry fool too. But dat be the forums sometimes.
I’ve commented similiarly before. Pelagos has many heroic qualities, he never gave up when he failed, his compassion was always there. I think there are people who are just stuck on wanting a powerful he-man to be given a reward instead of an unassuming heroic figure.
There are many reasons why Pelagos makes sense. Just because you aren’t willing to see it is a you problem.
No, there isn’t. Him self-reflecting on why he sucks does not make a great character. Him telling himself that Bastion is not his purpose does not make a great character.
If Pelagos was so invested in finding his ‘purpose’, why didn’t he spend time in any of the Covenants? He had an off-hand conversation here and there.
Pelagos didn’t do anything. Everything is again done OFF SCREEN.
Really. They could even kill Shaw and Flynn and make them Arbiter so they could appeal to the gay community if that was the plan.
Given the story that is presented to us, you’d be disingenuous to claim that Ghost Shaw/Flynn being arbiter out of left field would result in anything but the same accusations of “wokeness” from the community.
Pelagos’ story is not particularly done well, but he has had a role to play in every patch, across all four covenants and main storylines beyond. It’s pretty clear he was at least intended to become the new Arbiter from the very beginning, or at least usher in massive changes to the entire Shadowlands system.
Political views? I’m sorry? Just because you are a Proudmoore man don’t start assuming things about my life.
This is a Forum about World of Warcraft. Let’s keep this on topic. Stop trolling.
Stop trolling.
Your first post is really the troll post.
No, there isn’t. Him self-reflecting on why he sucks does not make a great character.
BWHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA.
Political views? I’m sorry?
You went straight off saying this
then suddenly becoming the protagonist of it just because the writing team wants to go woke
You’re subtlety hiding the real reasons why you’re upset
People seem to dislike him too for not being a huge hairy jerk wad racist power hungry fool too. But dat be the forums sometimes.
Given the “woke” comment, I assume the OP in particular dislikes him because you can find out he used to be “she” while he was alive.
Is Proudmoore the gay server or something?
Who would you have as the Arbiter?
Another construct like the one after Zovaal.
??? “Subtlety hiding things”? Do you see imaginary things often?
What part of “it could be Flynn or Shaw” did you miss?
It is unofficially but I joined it due to west coast time zone for my raids in 9.1
A friend once told me that yes. But I’m not sure if Blizzard made it official.
Let’s keep this on topic.
And your topic started with:
because the writing team wants to go woke.
Define “woke” In the manner you are using it…
I didn’t know my entire post had only 8 words.
Are you sure you didn’t cut the rest of it off? Are you sure that’s my only post in this thread?
Or are you trying to mindlessly defend the people that felt hurt after my post?