thats the story where they largely rode on the coattails of wc3. randomly held a renaissance fair right as we were reaching the bad guys base. they turned the lich king into a saturday morning cartoon villain. Then gave him the “omg he is actually sorta the good guy deep down” plot twist?
I already told you it’s not up for debate and I’m not feeding into your continued delusion. The majority agree for a reason, you can pretend all you want.
WoW has always been extremely lame in its story. I dont know why they cant consistently put something decent together. Its like a dev or non story writer decides the main story line and they just tell a writer to make it work.
Amazing lore assets. Great world building. Unable to consistently tie it together. Fragments of the main stories are accidentally good. Over arching story? meh.
You aren’t wrong about the story being lame, but I got closure in WOTLK and enjoyed it, best expansion by a mile. It was closure to a game I played for years.
I don’t really hate any of the characters I guess. If I had to choose one that annoyed me a lot- it probably is Alexstrazsa. They played with the idea that because they are not mortals like us they were super out of touch somehow when it came to their feelings or understanding that others matter. But it just rubbed me the wrong way I suppose. She really made me scratch my head and wonder just what made her a queen of dragons by the end of it all. Lol
If anything she came off like a bully that only listened when she had no choice. Then she let other bullies join her to fight others that had enough of her!
No you didn’t. You have totally lost this debate. Your entire argument is basically “I’m right, your wrong, I already told you (something I just asked for the first time), you are delusional”. You hardly ever respond to any rational point I make.
But here, I’ll give you another chance. In the lore we heard that the Dreadlords “materialized” in the Twisting Neather which suggests that they were teleported from somewhere else. There was no word on where they came from before that.
So how is providing background on where the dreadlords came from before they materialized in the Twisting Neather a retcon? Why is it not additional information.
We know the dreadlords provided the sword and helm but where does it say they forged the items themselves and didn’t get them from the Rune Carver?
Well then, this discussion is over, you can delude yourself into believing the majority don’t abhor the expansion, trying to blame youtubers and streamers for all the negativity, everyone except who you should be blaming… blizzard.
IIRC, I think the unholy legion artifact’s backstory was that it was a sister blade to Frostmourne, which no longer makes sense once it was decided Frostmourne originated in the Shadowlands.
Turalyon was just completely emasculated at the end of Legion when Illidan was just like “You’re done. Sit.” and then he transitioned into this like pseudo political figure.
Alleria is all The sacrifices I make as a mother to protect my son!
Oh… I’m back. Hi Son uh, lets catch up next week Mommy is still busy. PS I became the thing I hate to defeat the thing I hate!.. What do you mean that’s been done before…?
Jaina is just self righteousness personified.
The phrase “Rules for thee, not for me” summarizes her perfectly.
But she did an eye for an eye twice, she tried to do what Arthas did, she has nothing to do with the responsible Belfs when they were forced by Garrosh, and Dazar’lor when she’s never attack the roots of the problem in Ogrimmar.
It’s incredible that she was always a coward not to go to the real responsible ones like Sylvanas and Garrosh, and what she has done is nothing to imitate them and that the same scriptwriters saw the characters as right and done.
It’s a war, be careful when looking for heroes and villains, everything is power, not even for what happened in WW2, or in Star Wars, every war has to be seen in different points of view, not just in one.
That’s why Jaina, Tyrande, Sylvanas were the most hated and mixed characters in the community for their actions.
You don’t actually have to think something is well put together to enjoy it. That’s called guilty pleasure. And vice versa, you can think something is superbly put together but find it not to your taste.
That’s the difference between subjective and objective analysis.