You mean like when they said “we’re not going to use any crz or different server sharding options” and he takes that to mean no crz?
1 Like
Emphasis mine
This is the same thing I was just talking about. Everybody is setting themselves up as the authority on what is or isn’t an acceptable reason. I understand that we’re discussing opinions, but there’s little reason for either side to listen to the other when each side insists on clinging to the viewpoint that they alone have the right to decide what matters and what doesn’t. In essence it’s saying “You don’t agree with me? Well, your opinion doesn’t matter anyways.”
1 Like
there is no locking of threads due to number of posts anymore.
1 Like
Great! Then Pt.15 will be the last discussion made about guild banks. The final verdict will be made from this discussion. So far it seems guild banks has no argument on being in Vanilla.
not great, 14 should have been the ‘last’ , this thread did not need to be made. And actually either thread will end up having very little effect on the decision Blizzard makes on the subject, especially if they have already one anyway.
1 Like
Yup. Been there done that.
All i got was this lousy shirt and no counter points!
Surely you jest.
I’d link the post but you’ve seen it and ignored it. LOL
Please link this post because i don’t see one in this thread or the other 14. LOL
That’s a fact.
They are obviously paying attention, hence the announcement that LFG wont be in Classic and they made that announcement at Blizzcon a little after the demo was released. They are listening to us.
LFG was never going to be in Classic, us commenting the /lfg brought up the interface got nothing but a clarification as to why that happened, they listen , sure, but threads like this are a very small blip, on an issue like this it is safe to say they already know what they plan.
I already refuted your arguments but you cant accept that so you just say " no you never refuted I won, guild banks will be in".
Padrepwn ignoring facts again.
1 Like
There was a fast response though because a lot of people were in suck that it was even in the demo. Read what I just said again. RESPONSE. Responses mean they were listening to community. Your suggestion that they don’t read forum posts is invalid.
Oh this is comedy gold right here.
I guess if typing up that long wall of text breaking diwn every single point if your OP is ignoring you.
Then what exactly do you call what you’ve done (completely ignore) my initial reply to your OP.
Guess that must be grounds for a speeding ticket. LOL
There’s more logic in thus toon’s name than any post you’ve made in the last 9 days on that alt. LOL
Oh that is odd. I gave your “points” the respect of thought out replies.
Whether I agree with them or not I do feel in a discussion they at deserve as much.
You have completely ignored them and that fact while trying to slander my name.
Ignorance is bliss…
Still awaiting that logic from you.
Because so far you’ve ranted, slandered, and tossed your opinion about.
Not much else.
Im glad blizz gets to see this play out like this…
Yes and that was great and please show me where I said they don’t read forum posts,lol.
1 Like
Please link i must have missed it because you have have not refuted anything in my original reply to your OP.
You insists that they don’t take forum posts into consideration.
Um no, please show where I say they do not take posts into consideration, pointing out the extremely small amount of posters here and the posts we make are nothing but a blip is just how it is. They ‘listen’ sure, but on most subjects, such as this one, they likely already have a decision made.
1 Like
Keep telling yourself lies. I refuted. You just wont admit I did because you want guild banks added for convenience aka QoL feature aka not authentic aka doesn’t belong in Classic.
1 Like
I think the no changers would likely say their argument should be able to stop at it: it wasn’t in classic and the goal is to recreate as closely as possible, so changes that just = convenience for players really have no place in classic.
Most of the die hard no changers that “refuse to debate” feel like they shouldn’t have to argue NOT adding every single change that gets proposed, because the default approach should be as few changes as possible. If a change is critical to the modern functioning of blizzard games (bnet integration) or modern accessibility (color blind adjustments) people get it. But the longer the list of changes, the less classic it gets. I know you don’t like slippery slope arguments, but it’s really not a slippery slope to say there’s a whole bunch of different pro changers each advocating for their particular change in their own thread, and one of the most common arguments you see being made is “if x is in, why not y?” Each prochanger has their own particular thing they want changed, and instead of breaking each issue down, it really is simpler to say keep it as close as possible to original. Guild banks seem to fall squarely into ‘convenience changes’, so most people are going to dismiss it out of hand.
2 Likes
“small amount of posters” just like how pt 1 through 14 was just a bunch of “I want guild bank” spam that was 4 players not understanding facts
small amount yup, and everyone has their own ‘facts’,lol. The forums have always been a small part of the WoW community, most people don’t even bother coming here.