Well it’s still going.
Only the topics that have been consistent. Things like Classic™/Retail transferability and Class Balance.
![:cocktail:](https://d38bqls1q93fod.cloudfront.net/en/wow/images/emoji/twitter/cocktail.png?v=6" ":cocktail:")
Ah, OK. So I can necro the transferability thread and it’ll hold more weight to you?
No because your intention is not sincere. I mean really, this is what your goal is this morning?
![:face_with_raised_eyebrow:](https://d38bqls1q93fod.cloudfront.net/en/wow/images/emoji/twitter/face_with_raised_eyebrow.png?v=6" ":face_with_raised_eyebrow:")
This thread was LITERALLY necro’d as a distraction…
2 Likes
People are still talking about it.
People are still making threads about transferability.
Goalposts …
1 Like
It’s actually after 2100 where I’m at. And isn’t this the goal of posting? To keep the thread going?
All I did was make a point about what topics survived and you’re on some kind of xkcd-induced crusade to prove…what?
If a new thread on the topic is created weekly but doesn’t get over 100 replies does that mean the topic didn’t survive?
1 Like
It’s called traction
That’s…not what traction is dude
I know. You failed to answer my question, which is why I repeated it.
Go ahead. Tell me a topic is dead even though threads are consistently made about it.
1 Like
Then why not just keep posting on the one thread?
Answer: because it’s not that important and falls off the radar.
Like this one did, until it was necro’d as a distraction.
1 Like
I knew you were gonna say that. So why didn’t another thread get started?
Answer: traction
Because, as this thread indicates, only about 4 people are legitimately advocating for Gbanks.
1 Like
Well thank Elune you’re here
Sure, we’ll go with that.