I’m sure they reimplemented that one hour delay in the mail system just so every Tom, Dick and Harry can bypass it using the non vanilla QOL convenience of guild banks.
Or opening a trade window…?
1 Like
Yeah, that pesky one hour delay just SCREAMS that they favor convenience.
Read the whole threads. This isn’t about QoL. No matter how many times a poster repeats it.
Also don’t try that. Let your suggestion stand on it’s own merits. Guild banks sure do stand on their own merits.
2 Likes
No but that sharding and loot trading most certainly does.
1 Like
1805 posts. Noone will read it. Not even blizzard.
For me it’s simple ![:slight_smile:](https://d38bqls1q93fod.cloudfront.net/en/wow/images/emoji/twitter/slight_smile.png?v=6" ":slight_smile:")
- If they allow QoL (Like guild bank, which IS A QOL FEATURE for guilds), I expect them to add more.
And YES, this is a QoL which avoid guild masters having 100 alts to store things.
1 Like
Lol.
Search the forums. The number did get skewed but there are about 8 capped threads from the old forums. A multitude of other threads that didn’t go too far and this one infinite scroll mega thread. Oh and that other one that popped up a couple months ago from the “no change” POV.
When I made this one the previous one was named part 13. This one was started in the old forums and carried over.
Should Blizzard address gold sellers/buys? Or ignore people selling/buying when they put it in the ToS as not allowed? It will happen, without a doubt.
If there is no guild bank system. What will happen? When it does, should Blizzard ignore it?
The answer to this converts the QoL to a control.
1 Like
It’s hilarious to see any pro-guild bank talking about preventing ToS violations when more than a few guilds had no problem ignoring ToS when it came to account sharing.
This argument becomes “The rules only matter when they don’t inconvenience me”.
1 Like
Not sure why you avoid the question.
If 100% of the playerbase ignores a rule. Would Blizzard change the rule? At what % should Blizzard enforce vs adapt
1 Like
Well it seems blizz reads and listens more than any of us thought. If you could be so troubled to read any of the thread. A poster above made a comment about their post being edited by a mod. Not sure if that means they are reading this or not. /shrug
Not so simple for blizz. Well actually it is. They won’t allow LFR because of gbanks. I guarantee that.
Again. If you could be troubled to read the thread that is not what this is about. That QoL is a side effect and even that depends on from who’s PoV
Again. Scroll up and read that has all been gone over.
Oh a 100 alts per GM you say? My God all of that lag on prime time. Jeez oh peters! Blizz will shard prime time because of GBA’s. I’l take guild banks to avoid additional sharding for $300 Alex.
Loot trading is a QoL for both Blizzard and players. I guess you’re already expecting more QoL features then?
2 Likes
That requires actually traveling to meet the person which is the intent of reimplementing that one hour delay.
At this stage is there anything that hasn’t been gone over?
1 Like
You can ask for whatever you want. Whether it makes sense, is actually viable for classic, or blizz agrees to it are entirely different matters.
I’l say it again. Every suggestion should be weighed on its own merits. It’s cause and effects. Approved or not approved on it’s own. Not because of something else completely unrelated.
+1 for guild banks. I don’t see it as game breaking in any way
3 Likes
No.
EVERY argument for guild banks has been countered, no matter how much those who want that convenience would claim otherwise.
On the flip side, with one single exception, EVERY argument against guild banks has been countered.
The one irrefutable argument is that guild banks were NEVER part of vanilla, despite the mental gymnastics of a few posters that want to claim that they were part of vanilla.
Well I can tell you quite a few have not even bothered to read any of this thread let alone the previous ones that were capped. So yea there is a lot of repeat information. As you can see one poster felt the need to try and refute how helpful logs are. He wound up hurting his own argument. Lol
Watch we will see an attempt at running this back into a circle. Either a claim that all points are countered by each other or a claim this is just QOL/convenience.
Edit: post above me. Lol. Told ya.
1 Like
Off topic, but I posted a Beavis clip in another thread. Think Blizz will leave it up?
1 Like