No, of course you weren’t, because the wording of your original post totally didn’t scream pro-changes in the slightest /sarcasm. Your first post is basically a sales pitch for GBs, but yeah, whatever, you don’t want them.
It wasn’t about pro-changes, bud.
Wording it as a sales pitch to sell GBs, which weren’t Classic, is pro change. It’s all but transparent that you favour the feature and think Blizzard should add it like they did in TBC. It reads like a sales pitch.
Also the wording:
Clearly implies you don’t consider yourself to be in that group.
So back to ‘don’t you think Blizzard should… Whatever’ = pro change.
Nope. All I did was make a correction about why something was added to the game. No implications, no agenda. That’s on you if you saw it that way.
On the contrary, it’s on you for wording it as a blatant sales pitch.
It’s ok, many of the no changers don’t want to even realize their “safe place” already has changes nor will they acknowledge the reasons those changes were made. All of which guild banks can be shown to have similar effects and reasons for possibly adding them.
But hay, logic has no place in the eyes of the rose tinted glasses
Nope. The difference is things like Layering are necessary. Guild Banks are not necessary, they’re a desire and convenience.
I’m surprised Fesz isn’t in this thread every day.
/sarcasm on
The slippery slope doesn’t exist.
Blizzard already made some changes, so this non vanilla QOL convenience that I want should be added. While we’re at it, Blizzard should bake in add-on functionality baseline since I’ll claim that add-ons are a security risk.
The changes I want are all reasonable and necessary and every one of them should be added.
The changes I don’t want, though, are, of course, totally unreasonable and should never even be considered.
/sarcasm off
This is the litmus test for “someone never stole our guild stuff in vanilla”.
Some of us didn’t give all our stuff to a “Guild Master Alt” and expect it back…
There’s trust, and gullibility.
This is the litmus test for “I wasn’t in a raiding guild”.
I ran a raiding team, made up of multiple guilds. Including running the Raid Bank Alt.
Hmm. No, you didn’t.
Sure I did. Tempest, Group 3 of the Thunder Down Under raiding alliance.
https://web.archive.org/web/20071012191007/http://www.tdua.net/
Bleh, Wayback never actually captured the site deeper than the front page.
See, this is how I know you didn’t raid.
REAL raid teams were built on trust. You pretty much defined that you didn’t raid because you treat alt guild banks like cancer. Those of us that actually raided would do what’s necessary for the good of the guild.
But once in a while you had someone who just up and quit the game (proof - that person has never logged in again and their toon is level 60 on the armory). So yeah, real guild banks were a necessity, and WoW was already behind other games.
No, I totally agree. And we trusted the people who had our guild bank stuff.
We didn’t need Guild Banks to do it.
By your own logic, you have proven that you don’t need guild banks, because you can trust the people you raid with.
Clearly your bank manager wasn’t a raider then, or you wouldn’t have to worry about them being untrustworthy, or selfish…
I never said it was the bank manager.
Were you one of these groups that shared accounts so you could all get access to the bank?
i.e. You were doing untrustworthy things in the first place?
Oh snap! Look, kids, someone thinks they’re being clever! They can’t win the argument so they pull out the TOS.
So that’s a “Yes”?
People who were willing to share accounts, by default are untrustworthy, because they’re breaching the game’s rules for the purposes of convenience.
By definition, you chose the wrong person to trust.