This is a very optimistic outlook, and I agree. Perhaps their focus is on solving the problem. Still, some sort of nod like âWeâre actively working on itâ would go a long way for most.
I highly doubt he wants that.
Seems he just wants to pop in and white knight for some odd reason.
I try to be positive. You gain nothing from negativity.
From what Iâve seen from CM, they report what they can, when they can.
If there is nothing to share, they usually donât say anything. From US forums anyway.
CMs in EU post frequently âno new info to shareâ.
If the US forums werenât so volatile any time a blue posts, CMs would probably post more stuff like that here.
I have read the thread, and I agree with most of your conclusions. Which is why I spoke up in the first place. Most people who are intentionally abrasive wonât be swayed by any sort of conversation. You seemed like someone who might be able to benefit from having their faux pas pointed out.
When Agaris stated âThis is not helpful. Please stop posting this.â I took it as someone trying to point out that you stating that what they find valuable is âessentially worthlessâ is abrasive and painful. Which is why they politely asked you to stop. Instead of acknowledging this, you counter attacked, claiming their own post was less helpful than the one that they found offensive. You donât have the right to tell someone they are not hurt or should not be hurt by your actions.
Granted, I chose âcounterattackedâ intentionally, as being kindly asked to stop can still be seen as offensive and it is very human to get defensive at any critical response, as you did to my post.
Now you know, if you didnât before. And if you did know before I spoke up, then my words were wasted, and I apologize.
I literally said YOU assign the value. I didnât call other peoples possessions junk.
I even provided a screenshot of my bags to show my junk that are treasures to me.
You are being dishonest at best.
They didnât include any kind of context, so why are you assuming their intentions?
You assumed their intent and chose to attack me.
And they have the right to tell me to stop posting. Hypocritical much?
The difference being they didnât include any kind of context and essentially told me to stop posting.
Where as I was talking about a topic and said its all subjective in what and how you keep things.
Iâll accept you apology once you edit/delete your initial post to me. Then I shall do the same.
Oh yes, I was agreeing with you. I was going by the logic of the trolls that are saying the items are âworthlessâ, and just taking that to its logical conclusion.
I know it has only been a week, and as someone who has lived in the tech world and data center space for awhile, I understand the nuances and issues surrounding most coding. I was wondering if this is still being tasked, or if the task is complete and there is no more news or any new updates to be had. At this point, I would imagine a âweâre done and thatâs allâ is going to settle in better than no news. If there is any chance of an update, or even closure, weâd appreciate it. Thanks.
Aye, they are just as wrong (if not moreso) than you. But they are hurting more than you are due to your ability to distance yourself more from the unfortunate damage, and I doubt my calling the people throwing the âtrollâ title around are in any condition to understand their mistake and improve, whereas I think you are more than capable of it. On the odd chance that they can see a rational, reasoned discussion that brings up their pain points without causing more, perhaps they can be brought around.
As I said, I donât think you are a troll. Youâve had measured responses throughout. But you did have some abrasive posts that you may not have realized were abrasive, and I thought it worth the time to point them out.
In all honestly, the fact that you want to sit down and talk rationally is the only reason to make a post and tag you in it. If you were a troll, it wouldnât be worth the time.
If you read my post as an attack, then it failed miserably in its purpose. For that I do apologize. No harm was intended, merely some help pointing out why others may be reacting (or overreacting) to your posts.
I agree completely. In-fighting, back biting, and name calling are just not in my bag of must haves. I would rather sit and speak rationally. As for my âabrasive postsâ, weâll find most, if not all of them, came on the heels of emotional escalation which seems to drive a fair few people to more bold and unneeded commentary. Iâve tried logic and reason, and even tried to help compartmentalize how to handle these pixelated memories in a game. âCollectorsâ seem to run off emotion, and not logic, so while your suggestion of giving them time to see reason and come around for civil discord seems like a solid plan, I am not sure they even want to. God help us all if Blizz either says, âWe are done restoring itemsâ or âwe consider this matter resolvedâ and locks the thread. The uproar alone would send me into a posting hiatus for 6 months.
Here is the full post you partially quoted.
Hope that clears everything up.
They arenât overreacting to the above, which you were replying to.
Some are merely upset over the term âhoardingâ or âhoarderâ being applied to in-game items and storage.
But regardless, trying to shut someone up because you disagree with a word or term is ridiculous at best.
I like the analogy. Because yes, bad things happen even when you try your very best. But it seems that M$-Blizzard was NOT trying their best. I think a lot of the PEOPLE were. But the company as a whole probably could have done a lot more to try to keep this from happening, from making sure that all departments were well-staffed, that experienced, knowledgeable people regarding the specific systems that they use, were on hand, that they did more than adequate testing, especially when introducing a system like Cross-server guilding, and making sure that the product is actually ready to ship before getting it into paying playerâs hands.
The constant cost-cutting layoffs, merging of âredundantâ departments (even if the systems used were vastly different), putting out a âroadmapâ and sticking to it, even if what we get is buggy as hell and not ready to ship - it was all done to make some people extra money. Theyâre not going broke. Theyâre not little mom & pop business that had to let go of a cashier because they can barely pay the rent on their business. It was all done deliberately and in a calculated manner. It was their choice to not say anything for OVER A MONTH, which made people angrier. Sure, theyâd be facing an angry mob anyway, but shoot, send someone whoâs not under the pay-grade to take that. Also, if they had at least tried to work with us (sorry, what they call ârestorationâ was just more insult as the ONLY stuff I got back were things I already had) even if it took MONTHS and were honest about what they were doing to do and how long it could take. people would probably be satisfied.
To be fair, there are studies out now that seem to point to a conclusion that all decisions are run off emotion, and what we consider âlogical decision-makingâ is mostly the ability to rationalize the emotional decisions we make. Iâm not sure I fully buy into the conclusions, but it has helped me work with others Iâd otherwise consider irrational, and perhaps given me a small bump to processing time between stimulus and response. One of the reasons I prefer written communication to spoken is the time lag, letting me catch my own actions that I deem too emotion-sourced before committing to posting them.
In the circumstances of this thread, we have a large number of individuals united by a common pain, especially newer/less active posters. Thatâs what pain does, it triggers actions that otherwise wouldnât be considered.
If we take the source of the pain the sudden loss of large amounts of time as represented by the stacks of stuff in various vaults, any posts that seem to devalue the lost items will trigger defense responses. Itâs these that likely lead people to lump the originator in with more overtly trollish company.
Honestly, I donât feel like the trolls have been out in any real numbers on this topic. Other than a very few notable exceptions that the mods seem to have quickly taken care of, most of the conversation has been civil. Perhaps the lack of obvious and persistent trolls adds to the number of false positives.
Thatâs a very astute assessment. Other threads of which I have visited almost feel as though every other post comes from a known offender. This thread has a different feel where instead of seeing legitimate trolls, certain individuals are instead bestowing the title and fabricating a new reality that does not exist. Sadly, blinded by emotion, others see this person as a champion, when in fact, in a small way, they are simply filling a trollâs shoes by acting out in certain ways. Iâm glad weâre talking, and not just falling into that loop.
I mean itâs a part of the what/why you put things in your bank and storage.
And as Iâve said several times, itâs just pixels, who cares what you store and the why you store it. Why is it an issue calling a spade a spade?
But tanget topic aside, this guy said it better so Iâll just quote him.