Raedolf, as i’ve said before, it’s weird that you’ve spent so much energy trying to prevent other players from having an option most of us want.
Reflect on that.
No, wait, don’t respond. Wait and think about how weird that is.
Raedolf, as i’ve said before, it’s weird that you’ve spent so much energy trying to prevent other players from having an option most of us want.
Reflect on that.
No, wait, don’t respond. Wait and think about how weird that is.
I’m still hoping one day a blue will take notice and throw us an offical reply on a Worgen thread. But I’m not holding my breath that would be a death sentence.
I care about worgen. Plugging a tail on them cheapens the race.
I will not be letting that go unprotested, and I am here to make sure you do not start to think your fantasies are unanimous.
And no, Moronai, I am not alone.
How so?
The four fingers, hunch, wolfsbane, and anatomy makes a worgen different than other lycanthropic creatures, and makes it their own. Add a tail, and you cheapen its identity.
Blizzard chose the no tail option for their lycanthrope. Thses are worgen. My suggestion, if you want to be something else, go get a different curse.
I dont see how an optional tail would cheapen the race if anything is makes it look more wolf like. Every other aspect of a Wolf is given to the Worgen. So having the option to have a tail or not have a tail would complete the look. There are people who dont want tails and I understand that but making it optional would still be good as you could keep the old look if you want. Options don’t hurt a race but give us more things that make our characters unique.
Except tails. Almost like that was intentional. Almost like worgen aren’t wolves.
The look is complete. If Blizzard thought worgen looked incomplete, they would have changed them in one of their many remoldelings. There are plenty of options available to make your character unique, and you do not have to be a lorebreaking mutant to do it.
War paint, body scars, bite marks, claw length, etc are all possible and canon, advocate for those if all you need is something to make yourself look unique. And besides, from what little I can see from your profile, you’re beautiful as you are!
Except the concept art for my Worgen had a tail. I would like that option. Then its up to me if I would like to use it or not.
Worgen aren’t complete until they have an all black fur option
Give worgen TAILS ALREADY!
Just
Do
It
Give tails Worgen!
You know for the longest time I was against Pandaren becoming DK’s and used pretty much every argument you have presented in why you don’t want Worgens to have tails.
Then when it happend I accepted it because I realized:
A. Its something more people wanted then not
B. My race as it is has hardly anyone playing it end game
With these two things along I was happy for Pandaren DK’s even though I did not think they fit our aesthetic.
I’ll just echo what OP said and say: Give worgen tails.
Tails! Tails! Tails!
Give worgens tails!!
Hang on, but lots of werewolves don’t have tails.
Other races have become deathknights in the past.
What other races have grown a tail?
Red female Pandaren
Exactly, and plenty are shapeshift at will, are allergic to wolfsbane, and can pass the curse by bite. Blizzard chose which aspects they wished to incorporate into their lycanthrope, and those choices make the worgen what they are.
Right. So if they choose to give worgen tails, that makes worgen a race that can have tails.