Give us Dual spec so the game is fun

WoW Classic Cataclysm Classic Discussion
284

forum vacation doesnt affect my gameplay just like most of the forum threads dont change the game.

285

please list all the changes.

286

Or…we don’t like them. Considering retail is full of them, why not just play retail if that’s what you like?

287

I agree. This is the part that I don’t understand. If you want all the QoL bells and whistles in retail while playing TBC content, just level to 70 in retail and halt your XP and play in Outlands. I keep being told that all these QoL changes are “common sense” and “very popular”. If that’s the case then there should be a lot of players willing to take part in that kind of gameplay. Why come to classic, a game by its very definition, designed to be a recreation of the original and whine about missing features?

Edit:
Oh right, I forgot they cut your levels in half and made it so you can level in whatever xpack you want. I mean just makes it even easier. Just tell dragon whats-her-face you want to level in BC and go to it.

2 Likes
288

I’m actually all for dual spec in BC.

Of all the QoL changes that have ever happened to the game in that state I think that was the best one to every be put in the game

289

well apparently that 10 minutes of gold farming is onerous enough to warrant nonstop whining, so it sounds like a pretty big deterrent to me.

1 Like
290

dual spec is not a “QoL change”. you underestimate how much it would effect the game, as you immediate gratification beggars usually do.

6 Likes
291

Oh do go on, how would it break classic BC, I’d be enthralled to hear the negatives

292

try reading the thread. it’s all been pointed out here multiple times. we don’t need to have the same conversation over and over.

3 Likes
293

Most of it looks like “go back to retail”

294

there’s a lot more than that, but it is an excellent suggestion.

3 Likes
295

Can you highlight some

The only other one is “it devalues our roles”

Which it doesn’t

296

if the gold deterrent isn’t a big deal then it sounds like dual spec isn’t needed. i guess you can all stop whining now. thanks

1 Like
297

It actually does for certain specs. As a rogue if a healer priest swapped to SP they would have an advantage over you because they bring a lot more to a raid than a rogue.

Tbh though if you don’t understand the ramifications you shouldn’t stand up for it.

298

what’s funny is that in this world of insane gold inflation, dual spec dolts seriously want blizzard to take away one of the best gold sinks in the game. lol

1 Like
299

Yeah but not everyone was a mage in vanilla and/or bought gold

Even private servers for TBC put in some kind of dual-spec system, and they often go for the most authentic experience possible.

300

Runs are going to have the shadow priest required, doubtful they will bring a second one unless they are running an all caster pug and rogues do more damage than almost every hybrid in the melee slot unless enhance shamans somehow pump those numbers which would require someone to have a fully geared enhance shaman ready to snatch that slot and they didn’t need another healer

Aside from that I’m sure they could make it a gold sink with a buy in price of like 2k like I think it was in wrath

So we are really grasping at straws here, we’ve already got bloody boosts for god sakes

301

I played on a private server for 4 years that didn’t include dual spec. That server was blizzard like and did not die. It was not pay to win.

Every tbc classic p server with dual spec is instant 70 or worse pay to win

302

Again if you don’t understand why it won’t effect you shouldn’t be for it. It absolutely diminishes the reason you pick a class or spec.

Imagine farming two sets of gear for one character. No thanks.

303

How does it do that aside from making someone run to org before farming motes of air or jumping on their warlock alt they boosted to do the same thing?

I get it; you just want more people to buy boosts