For those that are hard line no changes what are your thoughts on the ban put in place on multiboxers for battlegrounds.
A lot of people say they’re easy to kill, many say it’s unfair. Do you still support no changes or some like this that make a majority of players happy over a super minority?
what ban? what are you talking about? The only thing I recall is that they are disabling follow. Never heard of any ban.
The no follow is the ban, as they claimed it was for botters. However bots haven’t used follow to my knowledge since BC. As the change in BFA to cancel follow on any pvp engagement it’s pretty easy to see these changes are specifically targeted at multiboxers.
Where is your blue post or interview video that supports your claims?
I didnt mind them years ago… Dont care if they come back… I two and even 3 boxxed a couple times… Its not for me… was nice Raf leveling. sometimes U get lot of kills from a mutliboxer and you take out his main… Other times You get hit with 10 abilitys at same time and die… Always fun either way.
#no changes
There is no spaces in #'s
No follow is implemented in classic as of this moment, I don’t need a blue post.
Then we dont have to believe there is a ban. No proof to support your claim means there is no such thing as them banning multiboxers
Ah rhetoric…You can still join BGs as a multiboxer, but can’t use follow. Meh, MultiBoxers are quite savvy and they’ll find a way.
Hashtags are still foreign to me, is there a reason for that, genuinely curious.
Don’t get baited, people.
Since you have no proof: We can assume you are talking out of your butt. (Why filtering? Why?)
I don’t think it is a big deal. Most people who want to multi-box will be using a key-clone software that will replicate the key presses and distribute it to multiple clients.
Prediction…
This thread with become a Multibox hate fest in no time.
Why can’t you just play one character like everyone else?
There is no rule saying you can’t multibox in bg’s but they’ve tweaked the game system to make multiboxing impossible in bg’s. If your argument is really just the fine print then I don’t know why you’re wasting your time. This thread is about changes into classic not on the enacted policies.
it’s to keep Hashtags searches simple. If you do “#No Changes”, the search/link engine will just link the “#No” part. As someone who works in the behind scenes of a website: I know it does things like this.
You need proof to back up anything you say. We do not need to prove that you are wrong. You need to prove you are right. And with no blue posts or interviews specifically stating what you are claiming: we can just chalk it up as your just making lies.
No proof? It is literally in the beta that we’ve been testing. Are you saying unless I link a blue post directly to this then it isn’t real?