And yet, you’ve said many times in this thread that this feature is like so many other games with “story modes,” when Blizzard has never used that term when referring to follower dungeons. I’m not sure I’ve ever come across someone that’s so set on pedantically arguing about something that apparently doesn’t matter to them at all.
Also, I was just pointing out that in FFXIV it was different than you said, so others would know that, since apparently, you don’t even play that game.
Because you have been just with nicer looking words.
Maybe you don’t intend it this way, but it comes off like you think you’ve always known what the full intent of this was due to a feature in TOR, and that there is no way anyone else should have come to the conclusion from the prior available information, that included no mention of changes to the rewards from a normal mode dungeons.
People didn’t just make up how it worked on the PTR until recently, and no one inserted anything into blizz statements, other than people who seem to think a lack of mention means a signal to remove. The article keeps using the term Normal dungeon, so I don’t think it’s a stretch to interpret that as the change to the feature being the npc companions (which, at least when I watched someone do it, could fail and will despawn if you die) and not in the viability as an option to level with.
And you can still have your boring zerg rushes all you want, no one is taking that from you.
Therein lies the problem. Blizzard isn’t going to kill the LFD system. So there has to be a way to keep the LFD system functional. Their design philosophy is to incentivize group play and incentivize it more the more difficult it is.
The conversations in many of these threads have been the similarities and differences between the systems for these games.
I’m having a conversation. I’m giving my opinion, my perspective and somehow that’s suddenly bad? Why is it okay for others to argue their opinions and views and not mine?
You replied to me, thus the presumption that you were speaking to me. Not that far back, the similarities and differences of that system were pointed out in a discussion.
I did not and I’m getting very tired of being insulted for the way I write things, instead of people ASKING me what I meant.
So yes, what you said was absolutely offensive to me when I was having a very civil discussion and voiced my confusion, my perspective and NEVER ever called anyone stupid.
Next time, ask me what I meant first before insulting me.
Have you considered that maybe continuing to treat people who have not inserted outside information into what Blizzard has said, and based our opinions on that, and what had been the prior state of the feature as being wrong for taking the straight reading of the announcement as what we were expecting is also insulting?