Flight: Enough Already!

Agree 100 percent, or if you got it in say Legion it should go retro for WoD.

1 Like

I was there in WoD. I played the game and held out until flying was supposed to come back. Then 6.1 came and it wasn’t in. Kept waiting then suddenly one weekend blizz announced on a 3rd party website that flight wasn’t coming back in current and future content. They reversed that decision in a week as I and players like me unsubbed as soon as that announcement went public. So get absolutely fuarked. People accepted their pledge at the start of WoD that flying was coming soon on good will which steadily dried up as Blizz stayed silent throughout the whole event until that 3rd party announcement

5 Likes

LOL did you learn that in your freshman logic class?

Here, the number of upvotes is an indication of accord.

3 Likes

What leads you to this conclusion? There is literally no reason for you to fly if you don’t want to, regardless of the ability. If it is an issue of pvp, war mode on/off toggle; problem solved. If you don’t like flying, what gives you the right to say what others should do? Pathfinder is a decent compromise to experience the story as designed, but it goes too far in my opinion. The Exploration and even the story chapters complete should be all it takes. You have then “experienced” the content as designed on the ground. Rep grinds are too steep at revered as you will not hit those most likely while completing the chapters.

1 Like

Pretty sure everyone does, I’m sure you will as well in a few years.

Here, the number of upvotes is an indication of accord.

Which is…exactly what I said. :confused: It dos not make it a sound argument, though.

Well as I said in another thread, there are several issues for all the problems going on in gaming today…

Corporate greed, lack of innovation, companies unwilling to take risks and play it too safe mainly.

1 Like

Does the 25 bucks Fox fly? No? There’s your answer.
FOX EMOJI DOLLAR SIGN EMOJI

Yes the fox fly’s.
The new familiar one in cash shop.

Wrong.

I have a very logical argument. Indeed, Argumentum ad populum which I did look up in google does prove me correct.

According to Wikipedia:


The argumentum ad populum can be a valid argument in [inductive logic; for example, a poll of a sizeable population may find that 100% prefer a certain brand of product over another. A [cogent] (strong) argument can then be made that the next person to be considered will also very likely prefer that brand (but not always 100% since there could be exceptions), and the poll is valid evidence of that claim. However, it is unsuitable as an argument for [deductive reasoning]wiki/Deductive_logic) as proof , for instance to say that the poll proves that the preferred brand is superior to the competition in its composition or that everyone prefers that brand to the other.


Thus, my inductive logic in pointing out that my vast (125!!) number of hearts clearly means that I have my finger on the pulse of what the majority want (and not every single player/poster) is indeed correct.

I further put forth that when you look at the number of replies for this post you will see a statement when you hover over the orange number which states my topic has “an extremely high like to post ratio”.

That is coming straight from the mouth of Blizzard not me.

This also, via inductive logic does prove me correct.

Thank You and have a great day.

4 Likes

LOL. It’s not an “argument”. “Likes” indicate accord by those who “like” the post… just as formerly “dislikes” indicated disagreement.

I realize this is hard for you to understand, but it really is that simple.

The delay of flight is one of the worst decisions they have made in the history of the game.

It’s not just bad because people want to, but it’s bad because it’s a crappy business model. People are already paying to buy the game, then paying a subscription to play it, and now you extend those things because some developer has his dream of what fun is.

More people would stay subbed for longer, if Blizzard got out of their way and allowed them to enjoy the game. Who cares if they want to pick flowers or mine ore, they are still playing.

Time gating content in a subscription based game is a poor business model and anybody with integrity within Blizzard should be ashamed of supporting it.

8 Likes

It’s like they are selling us this walk through a park, and then they one day discovered that we would move more slowly if they covered the path in a few feet of mud. If we move more slowly, we’ll stay longer right? :woman_shrugging:

2 Likes

When flight opens up it should just be those zone chapters being done that is all that is required to get flight.
If its honestly about ‘immersion’ there is quite enough of it by getting that far along in the storylines. The rep grinding is just sadistic.

2 Likes

Raistlin my boy, you’re trying to argue that you’'re correct because a lot of people say you’re correct. That’s about as effective as Trump claiming his policies are sound because of twitter likes.

Move on.

But if he’s arguing that people agree with him, doesn’t people agreeing with him make him correct? :thinking:

3 Likes

:man_facepalming:

Yes, but logical thinking is too difficult for some. They like to pontificate, hem haw and argue with rational conclusions instead. :man_facepalming:

Sorry, but you didn’t offer any valid reasons to support your opinion.

3 Likes

i know right im so tired or flying too. its like i need a better to go from zone to zone. i say more boats. i love the ones from Tirgrade

Likes could indicate that someone likes the character name.
Likes could indicate that someone likes the overuse of italics.
Likes could indicate that someone is looking forward to the schadenfreude.
Likes could indicate nearly anything.

Dislikes? Don’t like the poster, don’t like the topic, don’t like the posting style, don’t like the grammar/spelling, reader is in a foul mood, etc.
Dislikes were indicative of just as wide a variety of things.