Because the complexity is managing bear weaving on top of that, which you people arguing in here all admit you don’t do. And the logs make it easy to understand why. Because you would struggle with assa rogue.
In this scenario you are assuming 100% of druids have to bearweave…
I assume that everyone who apparently cares about the amount of dps their class does will also do everything required to achieve the maximum number. Otherwise what are you arguing about?
In fact, really if you’re already gray/green parsing, the buff is irrelevant to you. You are still going to be the bottom of any competent group.
Oh here comes Burning on his alt to derail again.
If you assume this , then you are not bound to bearweaving, your argument only works depending on how blizzard tunes the class, and historically speaking ,bearweaving is not intended. Which is why … again… look at wrath and future expansions like pandaria, bearweaving is not intended.
If you assume the class is to be played as mono-cat , then would you agree simply adding a ff wouldnt make the class easier? , it would simply add a button so you could press another button
on the other side of the coin, if you assume the class is supposed to be bearweaving only ,i get what your saying , but from a druid perspective, i can promise you, bearweaving is not intended for many reasons.
one of the fourm mods actually acknowledged my feral post so there is hope!!!
Dont argue with Ikanaide the only rebuttle they ever use is wotlk warrior excuse which isn’t even relevant as this is cata and not wotlk but her and the other trolls have no other reasoning to use.
It’s “not intended” but it increases your dps, thus I assume you’d be doing it. Otherwise, again, what are we arguing for? You don’t care enough about your dps to learn the rotation beyond what you “want” to do.
“Acknowledged” is a funny way to spell “locked and hid my thread”
1 Like
Clearly you dont understand that tho it is used it is NOT how blizz wants the spec to be played!!!
reported for trolling bear weaving actually adds compelxity to the feral dps rotation. more then just 1 button. You actually gotta know when to swap to bear and what attack to use then when to swap back to cat. Now lets also not add in leave weaving or thornweaving either as that will just confuse you even more.
Feral is the most complex dps class and is the least rewarding.
In this specific argument is , my point the class should be optimal with mono-cat only.
The proof is the past and the future expansions. (how most feral players feel about bearweaving and blizzard ) ( hate to point out again, theres a reason they have guardian and feral moving forward)
Besides that , my other point is , even with bearweaving, the current class is in a horrible state, you can pick a bearweaving 99 parser vs a blue parser on a top 5 class and most of the time, the blue parser will laugh at the bearweaver.
So i guess i have two points
1.- (My and blizzards bias), mono-cat is intended, bearweaving is not.
2.-Current state of feral druid sucks, and id rather the fixed it by encouraging mono-cat through changes, not necessarily glyph , and would like the class from being 20th, to perhaps top 16?
So then what about Albinosnake parsing 99’s and 100’s and beating other mid-high 90’s?
Does he just become supreme overlord of all dps when you buff feral and he’s now even better?
His logs are public, again, what are we arguing about? You not liking the spec design and not wanting to learn the rotation so change the spec?
1 Like
That is one person. The game is not centered around 1 person!!!
Excuse me the adults are conversing here. Please take your angry trolling and derailing comments elsewhere.
1 Like
I mean if you are going to compare the best 100’s and 99s for a specific class.
Then you might as well compare him to all the 100’s of the other classes to see the big difference.
He’s not beating most high 90’s in the top 5 class at all. He will definetly beat low 90s tho , i give you that , but hey thats him , hes the goat
His damage per fight vs the top parsers for other classes is a joke, like a top raid would be much better inviting anything else than a feral druid, im sure they would prefer that same great player playing something different.
No!!!
is not trolling or derailing when you specifically pointed out the #1 feral dps and think the game is centered around them!!!
THE GAME DOES NOT CENTER AROUND THE TOP 0.01% PLAYERS!!!
Lets do that top 99 and 100s blood dks are beating feral TANKS are beating DPS This is not ok!!!
Then if you look at the max Blood dk is Ranked #8 in damage this is not ok!!!
He’s fairly competitive with Ahlaundoh’s numbers despite comparing feral to arms. Also you have to remember this tier is particularly unfavorable to feral in terms of fight design.
Conclave has you switching targets so you have to reapply debuffs. Alakir has a long execute phase so you fall behind there. Omnotron is where fire mages do 300k dps lmao. Magmaw is about cd line-ups with head phases and again, requires reapplication of debuffs. Atra reapply debuffs due to airphase. Theralion/Valiona has target swaps. Council is 2 target cleave with reapplying your debuffs constantly due to phasing. Cho’gall has target swaps. Sinestra has another long execute phase and a haste buff that benefits some classes more than others (like feral actually is only 2k behind arms here despite being F tier).
Feral looks far worse due to fight design and being on 4.3 tuning.
Warriors have been held to the standard of the top warrior for 5 years now. I’m not above holding everyone else to the same standards.
1 Like
Yeah our bleeds are going to do worse damage with the t13 unless they change the way rip works with the t13 4 set bonus, this is the only scary part.
I’m assuming you mean the 2p because the 4p is about tiger’s fury having a shorter CD, what’s the issue with refreshing rip with FB? Losing a tick if you bite at the wrong time or something?
Yeah i meant 2pc. Ferocious bite will grief the RIP damage modifier.