the guy is tripping and contradicting himself in every other argument saying MM can should be left alone to play with a pet because being optimal doesnt matter, fun matter, but then when facing the fact that BM can function with only one pet albeit not being optmal he loses his mind?
3 Likes
Thats because there is a gigantic wall of difference between a MM who don’t use lone wolf - making the loss in DPS much smaller to gain utility - when compared to BM not picking two of the main talents that make you do normal DPS and be viable in all forms of content - that literally open up to get more talents that buff your damage
The only people contradicting themselves are the clowns telling to go BM and suffer this huge DPS loss but don’t want MM to keep the pet because its inferior to lone wolf.
1 Like
That’s not the only people contradicting themselves, we also have the clowns who are defending the pet because of random bgs for their mm hunter who is their third alt… and who think that even though MM hunters have the largest advantage in random bgs with longest range in the game, arguably the highest burst, some of the most cc, that they also need a pet for defending flags.
They also think that people in arena are taking the pet because they want to… news flash, they’re not… they’re taking the pet because they’re forced to since you need master’s call to live, roar of sac to help teammates/counter certain spells, and pet stun to set up traps.
If we could get rid of some of these fotm rerolling bg hero clowns by removing the pet I’m here for it 
4 Likes
Ah i see, the clowns who think M+ is the only mode of playing and other game modes need to discredited.
Talking crap about peoplewith alts but we all know y’all are FOTM hypocrites who would pick pet or go to another spec/class if it did more damage
1 Like
Could be, I wouldn’t know I don’t do much m+
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. It’s very funny to me that pro-pet MM players are refusing to play a suboptimal one pet / minimal beast BM build because it’s a DPS loss while also wanting to ignore lone wolf.
7 Likes
Whats funny is people saying MM-pet cant exist because is not the best option(despite being a difference in 5%~) but they want people to play BM like you would play survival with a bow, completely gutting your spec not picking most of your talent tree spec
If you think this si comparable you are delusional
BM is a completely different play style. It’s like saying all the people who don’t want a pet should switch to Mage class.
13 Likes
So, if we want to play a sub-optimal way with MM/Lone wolf, but can’t because we lose the ability to call pets as MM, the solution is to swap to a sup-optimal spec of a specialization that we might not enjoy or whatever?
And some wonder why the “play BM” crowd spounds so tone deaf to quite a few of us pro MM pet hunters.
13 Likes
no that’s not what I said at all? lol? you don’t need to put words in my mouth just to get angry.
these people are saying: I dont want to play single pet BM because that means I am doing less damage than I could be doing with the optimal talent set up.
meanwhile, they are playing MM with a pet which is doing less damage than they could be doing.
2 Likes
Maybe think about the BS we have been getting, and then apply what you did say with that attitude. here is a hint:
If you want a pet, play BM or survival
If you want a bow/gunner spec with a pet, play BM
If you want a pet tank, play BM
etc.
It is not what you said, it is the fact that it comes on top of being told to just switch specs, which we might play sub-optimally anyway, instead of being able to play sub optimally with a spec we actually KNOW.
6 Likes
I did not tell anyone to switch specs. Read my post again before you get angry at something you made up in your own head. You are getting angry at me for something I did not say.
1 Like
I never said you did, that is on you, what I am saying is what you said comes on top of the idiots that are telling people to switch specs. in essence giving fiuel to these dingbats .
7 Likes
Again, you re making a false equivalence, thinking they are the same, tis your own fault for making fallacies and thinking they hold truth
1 Like
Not worth it bro
2 Likes
yeah just seems kind of pointless. the pro-pet people really dont seem to like when people disagree with them or even not agree with them 100%
2 Likes
Now the “go play bm crowd”, that actively want an option to removed, trying to troll people by telling then to switch spec, ignoring any form of argument or criticism are crying like they are the “persecuted” ones, who are being targeted, because people “disagree” in their crusade to remove something we had for 20 years out of spite
7 Likes
Also, there’s more to things than just being “optimal”. Having a pet out adds extra utility, like tanking a mob for you. Meanwhile a BM Hunter going single pet vs two pet isn’t gaining any utility by doing so, they’re just losing DPS. So it’s really not comparable at all. They just pretend it is as some sort of lame “gotcha”.
7 Likes
i feel like having a talent that lets you use a pet as a choice node with improved spotters mark would be fine tbh.
as long as they are adding petless versions of all the utility i dont really get why people are so against leaving options in.
3 Likes
Just to correct you, there is no “Petless” version of the utility being added.
Your spotting eagle is a pet according to Blizzard, and you are forced to use it. And it is the source of your utility.
5 Likes