No, it is not.
The devs failed at that when they made the class intially.
1 Like
In the scenario where I am the only Lust provider, it IS mandatory to clear the content. The timer will expire if you do not use Bloodlust. I am the Lust provider in my group with the current system. And that system of summoning a pet, bloodlusting, and then casting a 3 second dismiss pet is bad.
I give up on trying to educate you. You simply want to be perceived as right and have the last word, and you’re incredibly misinformed/have no idea what you’re talking about.
3 Likes
Yes. It is.
It is a famous pet class that drew millions of players over two decades and helped make World of Warcraft an international success.
9 Likes
Nope.
But you keep living that delusion. I’m moving on now.
Again, not mandatory, its optimal.
What happens if the group is
Druid, paladin, warrior, rogue and monk? do they not play the game? because no one can lust? or they can do it still?
And they can just fix this system, without removing the pet, just fine.
Try to educate yourself first, before claiming this kind of thing.
I already explained to you the issues, how it can be fixed and why there is no necessity to remove a pet, i dunno why you are still whining to me about
3 Likes
While I’m happy to see that the team is looking at hunter and realizes we need some changes, I’m just not thrilled with the idea of having pets appear that I have no connection to.
I DON’T want some random boar. Or random Bear. Can it be the bears I have in my stable? well sure then. If Not? I’d rather not have that ability.
I have specifically chosen the glyph that uses beasts from my stable for Dire Beast. Because I like those pets. I don’t want Rexar’s pets. I want my OWN.
10 Likes
Am I the only person that doesn’t really like how much Kill Shot is being integrated into the rotation? I want Kill Shot to hit like a truck and prefer it during execution phases like the good old days.
7 Likes
That’s just a silly thing to say. It’s always had a pet. The pet comes before any specialisation choice. Your baseline hunter has a pet. Lone Wolf as a talent has always been the choice to deviate from the standard.
9 Likes
I’m fine with it. I just wish it gave us the heal like it did back in WoD, when it did kill a target.
2 Likes
Read my previous posts about it.
I won’t comment further.
1 Like
Glad I am not the only one to realize the dude has his head in the sand. Hunters got to know when to disengage.
Luckily they have the technology to let you cast Lust without having a pet out. If only they would explore that further.
Even if they didn’t: god forbid the easiest class in the game has to strategically think ahead a few seconds. Surely the best solution is to annihilate the spec entirely.
4 Likes
You would have a better time if you had a pet to tank for you 
clearly skill issue
2 Likes
If you say so. Didn’t realize it was so skillful to have the game play itself. Ai vs ai combat is very interesting, I am sure.
Isnt what you are excited about? a fake bird pet that does everything by itself and you dont do anything? dont need to control, heal or command? its the spec playing itself
3 Likes
Lol. The bird adds more mechanical depth then lone wolf or the current pet. Not hard, since current marksmen has literally zero interaction with your precious fluffy.
Mechanical depth that you don’t do literally nothing about it, its a glorified buff that you have no control over
Yeah, it was too hard to play MM before
Except the part people need it for master call and bloodlust
3 Likes
Ah you diligence in hiding from the truth is almost admirable. Deny is the first stage of grief (according to some wack model in the 70s), so I can only hope you work through this at your own pace. Let it all out. Not wasting my time on this, that’s for sure.
Ok now you are playing the pigeon chess, good luck mate
3 Likes
Blizzard THEMSELVES in this very post have said MM from now on will have a pet. Our fight is over how said pet is implemented.
3 Likes