I read it and from my point of view, I’m abiding by it. But to others, I may not. So, how am I to know what I’m doing wrong, if it’s not explained, to me? You don’t NEED to, however why wouldn’t you?
Doesn’t mean we can’t tell the company that it’s a bad idea.
I read it and from my point of view, I’m abiding by it.
Then in which case all your caviling about fine interpretations of the rules really isnt an issue at all.
Doesn’t mean we can’t tell the company that it’s a bad idea.
And they are free to tell you their way or the highway.
Well initially you’ll get a very short squelch(first squeclh is 2 hours?) and that should be enough not to do it again.
It is an issue 'cause people are squelching others “just because”, which I would define as “harrassment” which is against the CoC, is it not?
And that’s fine, I can always take my money, elsewhere, and they’ll be scratching their heads, why their numbers keep falling.
Still can’t learn from an auto-mated squelch. It may be classified under something that was never intended, to be. And all you want to do is play an authoritarian.
The squelched person should get a message detailing why they were squelched, including the exact text.
And that’s fine, I can always take my money, elsewhere, and they’ll be scratching their heads, why their numbers keep falling.
Meliga
I will give you same advice I used to give people who got themselves into debt, through their own fault.
If you dont like what it says.
If you dont understand it.
If you dont agree with it.
If you have issues over “fine interpretations”
Dont sign it.
Dont click I “agree” to it.
Its that simple.
The one time it happened to me I got no such message, only one saying that I had been temporarily squelched.
To this day I have absolutely no clue what it is that I said that people got so upset by.
Hmm I got a message about why I was squelched that included the text as well as a message that was reported on the forums as well.
![:man_shrugging:](https://d38bqls1q93fod.cloudfront.net/en/wow/images/emoji/twitter/man_shrugging.png?v=6" ":man_shrugging:")
Yes, I understand that, to which I replied it was never intended to be so. So how can I re-word something, to not offend, to get my message across?
It doesn’t tell you that. AND, you can still APPEAL it, voiding the squelching and voiding the “punishment”. What “lesson” is being learned?
Are you for against right click reporting?
Wait, you yourself said:
If you don’t care what other people do or think, why are so insistent upon being able to punish those other people tyourself?
After all, whether or not they are not auto-squelched hardly affects you personally once you put them on ignore.
My only issue is interpretations, but that’s not an objectively good reason to cut myself out of life, in general 'cause IK how to defend myself.
Does my stance on it have any bearing on my point about how I wasn’t informed as to what exactly it was that I did wrong?
They have already punished me by forcing me to see their junk, if I right click report them it’s as a response to their aggression.
My only issue is interpretations, but that’s not an objectively good reason to cut myself out of life, in general 'cause IK how to defend myself
Then why did you agree to it if you had problems with it?
Because IK you can’t rid of somebody over subjectivity. People may interpret me as “rude”, but they have no objective base to get rid of me. Why are you so dead set against change?
Because IK you can’t rid of somebody over subjectivity. People may interpret me as “rude”, but they have no objective base to get rid of me. Why are you so dead set against change?
Doesnt need to be changed and theres no reason you cant be held to the same standards.
Meliga: The moment you clicked “I agree”, all your “fine points” became moot.
Blizzards games, Blizzard’s rules, take it or leave it.