By your own definition, though, you KNOW that posting a similar (or even the same) message in chat once every 4 minutes is a violation.
If you and your friends mass report Billy (causing him to be squelched) for “spamming” because he was posting a similar (or even the exact same) message in chat once every 4 minutes and Blizzard overturns that squelch, then there obviously was no violation, even though you KNEW there was.
The goal post has been purposely allowed to move right back off-field to continue not discussing the glaring flaws that this system encapsulates that two of these three people have been unwilling to discuss or acknowledge. The third simply wants you to believe that he’s above abusing it. "Just trust him "
Since apparently bad human behavior seems to be an imaginary thing, and given the keys to run fraudulent reports on others is just fear mongering, using their repeated line of logic would be balanced out by the WoW player base is so inherently good and controlled that there’s no need for any kind of reporting tool to begin with.
Countering a question with a question, answer the question, I’ve already decided i wont play because the community is not as ‘‘superior’’ as i was led to believe.
IK this was directed at Fesz, but I wanted to repeat my answer. I’ll continue to play, but that doesn’t mean I can’t continue to put the idea out there. Just like the people that eventually got rid of all those PvP Servers. Just like those of us that asked for Classic Servers, for 10 Years and was scolded for it. Kind of like how you’re doing it, right now. It’s an idea, a thought, a message, etc. It may take awhile, but that doesn’t mean we should stop trying
Again, just like all the ones that advocated for change on the way the PvP Server System works. And the ones that asked for Classic WoW. Which you, yourself, admitted, you were initially against. Now, it’s coming. So, what’s your response to this? 'Cause you never replied to it.
Again, which means you’re spamming this thread with the same jargon in order to intimidate us into silence because you don’t want to see change. And if I’m wrong, stop repeating yourself and come up with something new because at this point, you’re just spamming with the same jargon.
You are fear mongering, and you continue to fear monger . if you truly believed this was a bad choice you would voice your concern and then choose to not play, like an adult would. Instead you’ve come into an argument that has been playing out for Months if not a few years completely thrown out every single possible argument that has already been said, and continue to spout nonsense about abuse.
Just putting your fingers in your ears and going lalalala does not constitute an argument either. which is what you just did, you say this is a terrible choice then stick to your guns and don’t payor play. this isn’t the us government the only vote you have is with your wallet either use it or accept that you are a hypocrite, and have voided your concerns, because clearly it wasn’t that big of a concern if you’re willing to continue to pay the people whom you don’t agree with.
Y’see Melliga…thats the hole in this entire tapestry.
The correct answer would be “I wont play Classic”, which to me would say you actually have the courage of your convictions.
But you dont.
The moment you click i agree, you accepted the terms of a system you stated you disagree with on a fundamental level…and you will then continue to agitate for changes to a system you were presented with, were asked do you agree with this, and you said yes.
Its the same as signing a credit contract, then whining about the charges.
Seriously: either you stand by what you say, or you dont.
Weird. You’ve voiced your opinion here in this thread numerous times but yet haven’t moved on, like an adult would so you say. Am I right or am I right?
This argument in public spectacle at best has been playing out for a couple of months from what I’ve retroactively researched.
Last I checked, I’m still free to post on a discussion forum and if this change, among others make it into live, then I have no problem 1) not playing and 2) not continuing to talk about, but until that time I’ll remain raising valid concern despite your hilariously false claims against poor human behavior, but be a sport and show me how an adult acts, I’ll let you lead the way out of this thread at your leisure.
If the auto squelch is retained, I will not be playing at release.
I will likely wait to see if I am correct about the ease with which the system can be abused and the extent to which that abuse will occur before I start to play, if I even choose to play.
I answered the question.
Now it’s your turn.
If the auto squelched is removed for Classic,what will you do if you do not have the option to collude with your friends to squelch any other player at any time for every little slight you felt you had to suffer?
No, it doesn’t. I only left the Game, once, until the Classic Server Announcements. Nonsensical things don’t bother me, however the Game became really bad with it’s Animation, Re-Vamps, Social Interaction, etc., that I decided to stop playing. When I say I’ll continue to play, I’m talking about Classic, until they really damage it. Just like they did with Modern WoW.
I have no issues proving why I feel the way I feel. I’m not going to quit my job over a handful of people that annoy me. That’s silly. I got bills to pay, and I need money to pay for Clothes, Food and Shelter. You don’t have to like everything in order to adapt around it.
Just because I can adapt doesn’t mean I can’t voice my opinion, and you don’t scare me. I’m going to continue to voice my opinion, whether you like it or not. Unless you can approach me, civilly with facts and evidence (not insults) to help change my mind, you have no business being in this thread.
EDIT:
There is no “correct answer”. Again, I’m not going to quit life simply because I don’t like it. That’s silly. I’m going to advocate for change, and it’s OK to advocate for change while still playing. I don’t need to stop playing, in order to advocate for change
That’s silly. I’m going to advocate for change, and it’s OK to advocate for change while still playing. I don’t need to stop playing, in order to advocate for change
Actually you do, if you believe, as you say you do. If not, then why agree to terms and conditions you DONT agree with?