Mid-range should not change because it’s a defining feature of the class. It’s unique, keep it. Balance numbers and toolkit with it in mind.
Being born without thumbs is pretty unique too.
NO ONE WANTS IT. There’s NOTHING defining about shorter range. What’s defining are the abilities! Or being a dragon! You don’t see ANYONE cheering for shorter range.
1 Like
I want the shorter range.
Cool man, sounds good. I believe you’re just saying that to just be on the “other side” at this point.
But the majority of Evokers would probably welcome the change.
I also think it’s funny how you never actually answered any of our questions. You just kept repeating the same garbage over and over. At that point, it means you’ve lost man. You have nothing of substance left, though you really had none to start with.
1 Like
The same reason why people want buffs, and not nerfs.
Not for balance, just for a desire of more power.
I guess retarrded stubbornness wins this round, cause this is silly. Superiority complex from arguing against objective reality. The best we can hope is that when circumstances align to bring another Fauxtrasa into the world, someone steps in to stop it from happening.
Meanwhile back here in the realm of the truth, all we can do is wait for preservation to be designed to the same standard as every other healer in the game, as wild as that seems to some of these diehard fools. Its amazing how strongly some people will fight against something that would only benefit them.
5 Likes
It’s like acting surprised that people don’t want all abilities at 40 yard range as a warrior.
Cause it’s a melee class, and people like the concept?
Nobody is talking about melee classes but you.
All melee have the same range (melee). I want all range to have the same range (40 yards).
This isn’t rocket science.
3 Likes
Right? Like why are some loud, few so jazzed about not being able to dispel an ally in time? Or having to chase their party around to heal them? World of Warcraft? Nah, I wanna play World of CHASE-CRAFT.
It’s okay, he just doesn’t have anything else to add to the convo besides garbage and red herrings to distract from the actual topic at hand. He must be mad ADHD.
At this point, I feel bad for him and I think he needs professional help OR SOME PILLS.
There are other classes and specs that have more range, more output, better defensives, and better raid buffs than we have. There is no “trade off” argument. There is no “blizzard sucks at balancing” argument. Saying it’s “unique” is not an argument. It just makes you look stupid.
You either tune every Evoker spec to be even higher than BM is on that chart up there, or you relent, and give them a standard 40 yard range.
So, which is it?
5 Likes
Or tuning is where it falls, and range is what you keep.
Like how augmentation evoker was extremely busted.
And why would evokers be at the top instead of melee classes? They’re melee, and should be at top.
No, you don’t get to say anything else, except choose one option that Sithalos asked you for. Which is it man? And don’t forget to take your ADHD pills!
Because it’s a flawed argument, for some reason, because evokers have more range than melee, they should do more dps than melee too? That doesn’t make sense.
Ah, now you finally see.
our mid-range should be kept, and we should be balanced accordingly.
And based on RWF participation, I don’t think tuning is a disaster.
Present in all 3 races.
Glad you agree that range does not equal power since Evokers are not blowing either ranged or melee out of the water =)
Range is power though, give specs range, and they’ll do more.
Need to nerf something to compensate for the same level of performance.
And the most comical thing is, if Blizzard were to announce tomorrow that the range was now 40, do you think these same liars would be here posting about how the class is now overpowered? Of course not, they’d just enjoy being in parity with the other classes.
Like was said from the start, this entire “argument” is fabricated, contrarian garbage. No one with any sense at all thinks the shorter range is needed or is a good thing.
5 Likes