Every change is the next step to retail

[Frosto-faerlina]

@Ëmpathy-mankrik

put out legitimate and well thought out reasons

It’s not as if people haven’t. If you’re following this topic, there are several threads, some which have legitimate gripes against dual spec.

@Ëmpathy-mankrik

I’m waiting.

This is a pretty silly thing to say, imo.

@Bearyalln-tichondrius

Well I have to say I disagree with that entirely, I haven’t seen one person make a case for it not being added outside it wasn’t true to TBC.

I doubt that to be true, considering how active you are on the forums. I think it’s more that you just don’t agree, and are being dismissive of the opinions of others.

@Bearyalln-tichondrius

As for the upsides there are numerous

Are there? Name one. I haven’t seen a single upside that is unique to dual spec stated.

EDIT:

Oh, here’s a post about it. There are several points made in this thread, as well as the various threads it is linked to

No Dual Spec: Something Better

TL;DR: Reducing respec fees solves more problems than dual spec would. Dual spec is something that some people are asking for for TBC. Some people are against it. However, what people aren’t talking about is the actual problem(s) that it aims to solve, and/or whether it does a good job of solving that (or those) problem(s). The Problem. As I see it, respecc’ing maxing out at 50g/per is a high enough cost to prevent a lot of people from doing it often. Whatever the intended design decision he…